☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前What has NATO’s ‘expansion’ vaunted by secretary general brought?www.globaltimes.cnexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down113
arrow-up17arrow-down1external-linkWhat has NATO’s ‘expansion’ vaunted by secretary general brought?www.globaltimes.cn☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 年前message-square6fedilink
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down5·2 年前NATO’s only near peer adversary: NATO is overrated. Sure bud.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down9·2 年前imagine not being able to see that after two years of NATO failures
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down9·2 年前to win their proxy war in Ukraine
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·edit-22 年前That’s not what NATO is for. Read the charter. It’s a very short document, I’m sure you can manage.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down9·2 年前That’s true NATO is a protection racket that US runs in Europe. However, NATO has been directly involved in the war, and we’ve seen both NATO equipment and strategy fail time and again during the conflict. NATO has been exposed as a paper tiger.
NATO’s only near peer adversary: NATO is overrated.
Sure bud.
imagine not being able to see that after two years of NATO failures
Failure to do what?
to win their proxy war in Ukraine
That’s not what NATO is for. Read the charter. It’s a very short document, I’m sure you can manage.
That’s true NATO is a protection racket that US runs in Europe. However, NATO has been directly involved in the war, and we’ve seen both NATO equipment and strategy fail time and again during the conflict. NATO has been exposed as a paper tiger.