Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 年前“ARE YOU ALL SEEING THIS”sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1541arrow-down131
arrow-up1510arrow-down1image“ARE YOU ALL SEEING THIS”sh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · edit-22 年前message-square83fedilink
minus-squarevzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 年前Right? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear. I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.
minus-squarephorq@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEspañolarrow-up2·2 年前Or enemy list, but that might be too presidential…
minus-squarenintendiator@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 年前Maybe you jest but now I’m seriously wondering why hasn’t this been proposed. It’s defo better than something like “disallow list”.
Right? It’s less letters and it’s pretty clear.
I haven’t found a good action neutral replacement for “black list” yet though. “Deny list” and “block list” are too action-specific.
Sounds like a nono list to me!
Or enemy list, but that might be too presidential…
Maybe you jest but now I’m seriously wondering why hasn’t this been proposed. It’s defo better than something like “disallow list”.
Shit list?