• otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The tax isn’t supposed to punish the manufacturers, it’s supposed to disincentivize the people partaking in the vice by causing prices to go up.

    Raising prices may reduce intake, or optimistically go towards offsetting healthcare costs incurred by people indulging.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The tax isn’t supposed to punish the manufacturers, it’s supposed to disincentivize the people partaking in the vice by causing prices to go up.

      Yes, but you did not understand what i wrote, i meant that precisely this was wasted by capitalism because prices of ALL drinks went up by roughly the same, not only the sugary ones, so even such crude incentive went completely to waste, not even noticed in practice.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Idk… here we have similar tax and that caused what expected more offering of sugar free versions and trying to sell you that instead. That said some of the sugar alternatives…have it’s own issues.

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Idk… here we have similar tax and that caused what expected more offering of sugar free versions and trying to sell you that instead.

          We too have sugar free versions, but those cost the same as sugar ones while they include no sugar tax but more profit instead.

          • XTornado@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah… But still that is a good thing, as they know they can get more profit with the sugar free version so they push those more to people.