I mean fuck the British government, but how much more explosive-then-ignored can those reports get. Extremely depressing to see the already way too permissive 1.5%-target get pushed up to 2.8% or whatever.
I agree with your point, but I suppose the reason they want to sit on the report is so they don’t get accused of ignoring the advice that the report they commissioned recommended.
All of them are almost cynical compromises that then get thrown around as hard goals humanity must achieve, when really they’re meant as “the absolute minimum to prevent catastrophe”.
I mean fuck the British government, but how much more explosive-then-ignored can those reports get. Extremely depressing to see the already way too permissive 1.5%-target get pushed up to 2.8% or whatever.
I agree with your point, but I suppose the reason they want to sit on the report is so they don’t get accused of ignoring the advice that the report they commissioned recommended.
I think it is probably just too dark. The is no point scaring the horses if you can’t or won’t do anything about the threat.
Oh sure, mine was just a side remark wrt this article.
That’s optimistic, here’s Bill McGuire on the issue
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ydTfg53D8I
All of them are almost cynical compromises that then get thrown around as hard goals humanity must achieve, when really they’re meant as “the absolute minimum to prevent catastrophe”.