• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not really, because he describes an escalation, which is the third option. As in there are 2 ways to continue the war, status quo or escalation, and the alternative to those is the peace agreement.

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are other peace agreements available. A continued engagement would be more likely to generate them, too.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Holy fuck I’ve never seen someone so callously support continuing to kill civilians just to get “a better deal” when it took 3 months of killing civilians and life supporting infrastructure to get to this deal.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        So you are saying an infinite number of possible peace agreements equals infinite possibilities?

        That’s not how this works, peace talks is one option, not infinite.