• seathru@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If Musk sold every single thing he owns today, and then paid his debts; would he have anywhere near a trillion? Because if not, that’s a weird title. Or does trillionaire just mean “has a trillion dollar credit line”?

    • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If Musk sold every single thing he owns today, and then paid his debts; would he have anywhere near a trillion?

      There’s no way he would be able to sell all of his corporate stock at once. It would be breaking, headline news if Musk was trying to sell all his stock, and it would almost certainly cause the share price of Tesla and SpaceX stock to plummet.

      The only way Musk would ever have $1 trillion of actual, liquid dollars would be if the US had a Zimbabwe runaway inflation scenario.

      • redsand@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Looking at the guy they’re replacing JPow with and the AI bailout on top of some other timebombs like auto loans… Zimbabwe seems likely

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      does trillionaire just mean “has a trillion dollar credit line”?

      I mean, that’s a pretty good position for him to be in. Probably better than having a trillion dollars in cash or hard assets.

      • seathru@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Not if the vast majority of that is already debt you can’t back up. But I’m really just complaining about semantics. Seems wrong to call someone a trillionaire that couldn’t actually put a trillion dollars on a poker table.

        • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          couldn’t actually put a trillion dollars on a poker table.

          Thats not how net worth works… even for normal people, money on a poker table is an idiotic measure of net worth…

          • seathru@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Is it? Basing it off imaginary stock market numbers sounds idiotic to me. And that is a hill I will die on.

            • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              50 minutes ago

              even if you if you ignore stocks… i own a home that is appraised by the city and taxed at $300k (i’m not talking about an inflated valuation by a real estate agent here), but i only have $5k in liquid cash to bring to the casino floor… you’re telling me that my net worth as a person is only $5k? if i were to apply for a business loan, the bank should assess my net worth as $5k?

              i’m really glad the real world doesn’t work that…

              • seathru@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                38 minutes ago

                What’s the debt on the house? 0$? If it is actually salable for $300k, then net worth would be $305k. Owe $200k on it? $105k net worth. That’s what I meant by “sold every single thing he owns today, and then paid his debts”. Actual tangible assets.