None of those issues you mention are real or relevant. I think you’re imagining an “AI politician” that’s like the president or majority leader: has to interact with people and the process in many different points, has to come up with a strategy and convince people to follow it. I’m talking about voting machine. There are 400 representatives in US. Most of them are just that, voting machines. The problem is:
they will say one thing to get elected and then do something else (Fetterman)
they can’t be elected because of some bullshit they did 20 years ago (Platner)
they get corrupted by this fucked up system
What you need from a average representative is not to write bills and “make correct and rapid decisions in a crisis,”. It just has to:
present his program before elections (“I’m for affordable housing, public healthcare, wealth tax” and so on)
vote yes on bills that help realize his program, vote no on bills that don’t
You put the program into the prompt, give it the bill and ask if the bill supports the program or not. My guess is you could easily replace 300 representatives with that without affecting the whole process other than making it cheaper, more transparent and less corrupt.
As for technicalities, just say “we’re using qwen 3.6 with those params”. The prompt is public. Everyone would be able to verify how it should vote. There would be minimal variability but I think any real shenanigans would be detectable.
None of those issues you mention are real or relevant. I think you’re imagining an “AI politician” that’s like the president or majority leader: has to interact with people and the process in many different points, has to come up with a strategy and convince people to follow it. I’m talking about voting machine. There are 400 representatives in US. Most of them are just that, voting machines. The problem is:
What you need from a average representative is not to write bills and “make correct and rapid decisions in a crisis,”. It just has to:
You put the program into the prompt, give it the bill and ask if the bill supports the program or not. My guess is you could easily replace 300 representatives with that without affecting the whole process other than making it cheaper, more transparent and less corrupt.
As for technicalities, just say “we’re using qwen 3.6 with those params”. The prompt is public. Everyone would be able to verify how it should vote. There would be minimal variability but I think any real shenanigans would be detectable.