cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/47630834

Since October 1, 2025, the US has accepted 6,668 refugees. Of those, 6,665 were white South Africans. Three—admitted last November—were from Afghanistan. No other refugees were admitted.

That data is backed up by the US Refugee Admissions Program, a federal public-private interagency collaboration program that works on refugee resettlement.> …

A presidential memo from September announced Trump’s intentions: that the refugees accepted “shall primarily be among Afrikaners from South Africa” and “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands.”

The Trump administration sees Afrikaners, an South African ethnic group descended primarily from European settlers, as victims of white “genocide”—a racist conspiracy theory promoted by many on the far right, notably Elon Musk.

  • SuiXi3D@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Not enough home grown Nazis, so they gotta truck ‘em in from elsewhere. How pathetic.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Since October 1, 2025, the US has accepted 6,668 refugees. Of those, 6,665 were white South Africans. Three—admitted last November—were from Afghanistan. No other refugees were admitted.

    That data is backed up by the US Refugee Admissions Program, a federal public-private interagency collaboration program that works on refugee resettlement.> …

    A presidential memo from September announced Trump’s intentions: that the refugees accepted “shall primarily be among Afrikaners from South Africa” and “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination in their respective homelands.”

    The Trump administration sees Afrikaners, an South African ethnic group descended primarily from European settlers, as victims of white “genocide”—a racist conspiracy theory promoted by many on the far right, notably Elon Musk.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I think Harris planned to do the same thing, so it really doesn’t matter which party is in power.

    • Yliaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      56 minutes ago

      Wdym you don’t think Harris was better for the US? /s

      To the downvoters: this isn’t a Dems vs republicans issue, it’s a US issue. It’s a uniparty system that’s working as intended, which is why it needs to be completely abolished and revolutionized.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 minutes ago

        If you don’t think Harris would be better for the US than Trump or that she would only let in white people from South Africa, you’re insanely delusional.

        While it is definitely a US thing, it’s also a Republican vs Democrat thing. Neither party is even good, but one is way worse in almost every facet than the other.

        If Harris won, do you think we’d be engaged in a war with Iran right now, or that the straight of Hormuz would be closed, or that the Epstein files would be as blocked as they are? Do you think she would have signed a bunch of EOs that are illegal to enrich herself and her family? Do you believe that ICE would have invaded cities all over the country, illegally capturing minorities and murdering two people? No, none of that would have happened, because she is better than Trump, and that’s a Republican vs Democrat thing.