• meco03211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Fun fact, law enforcement is bound by the fourth amendment against performing illegal searches or seizures. Any evidence gained from “the fruit of the poisonous tree” is generally inadmissible unless they can prove they could have found it through other legal means. This in no way prevents them from using evidence gained through illegal means and provided to them outside of direct law enforcement action!

    • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      18 hours ago

      As an aside, the fruit from the poisoned tree has long been admitted into evidence through several pathways. One such end run is called parallel construction, they get illegal information, then find a legal way they can use it in court.

      But they often don’t have to, long long ago the scotus said the evidence could be admitted if the police thought they were following the law. So they can plead stupid.

      Nevermind the requirements that warrants, if they even bother with them, specify what they are looking for, before the 80s if they were looking for guns but found drugs that were not listed on the warrant, it was inadmissible, but now anything they find they can use.

      If you are rich and have a lot of money you might be able to fight some of that, but for almost everyone, you are fucked.