State’s governor looks to thwart US president’s plan to divert money to allies, including January 6 rioters

California governor Gavin Newsom is looking to thwart Donald Trump’s $1.776bn “anti-weaponization fund” by imposing a 100% tax on any payout received by state residents.

In May, the Department of Justice (DoJ) announced a fund to compensate alleged “victims of lawfare and weaponization”. It’s unclear who qualifies under this category.

The fund was the product of a settlement reached between Trump and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) – the agency the president sued over his leaked tax returns.

Critics, including Newsom, have slammed the fund as a “boondoggle” designed to divert money to Trump’s allies. Speculation has swirled that its benefactors could include the individuals who were arrested in the 6 January 2021 siege of the US Capitol. The Trump administration has described the rioters as patriots and since pardoned many who were charged in relation to the attack.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I like the energy here but… I dont think much of this money is destined for Jan 6 idiots. Surely their usefulness to Trump is finished.

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The money is to whoever trump wants to give it to for whatever reason with zero accountability. It doesn’t matter whether any Jan 6ers get any of it, it’s 100% illegal theft of taxpayer money by trump.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 hours ago

      oh it’s just manufactured midterm consent. the money is advertising more than anything else.

      • fizzle@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yes, but the types of people Trump needs a slush fund to pay, are the types of people that can arrange to receive the money in the most advantageous jurisdiction.

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      i also assume so. and in the case these assholes would receive something, i assume they would just move after this pr stunt?