• jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    A 6,000 seat house would be less functional, not more functional. You may reduce the gerrymander, but cripple government.

    • stickly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      In what way? It’s not like they don’t already have rules around how long people can debate, when sessions happen, what technology they use, the powers of committees, etc…

      It’s not the 1700s any more, it doesn’t take a month to organize and transit 1000 people or even 10,000 people. Hell, you can fill a football stadium with 100k people on two weeks notice when the team advances in the post season.

      Changing apportionment rules is not even that rare historically, we’ve just been brainwashed to think 435 is some sacrosanct number. If we scaled with the number of reps on the 1910 census we’d be well over 1400 by now.

        • stickly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          And yet somehow in a country of 340 million people we see these polls:

          • 80% were not in favor of attacking Iran
          • 80% believe abortion should be legal
          • 60% thought Trump should be barred from office in 2021
            • Similar numbers want him removed now
          • 65% are opposed to ICE’s reign of terror
            • > 50% want to abolish ICE completely
          • 74% support universal free school lunches
          • 62% support raising the federal minimum wage
          • 67% want to raise teacher’s salaries
          • 75% want to reverse the Citizens United ruling
          • 88% support federal laws that would guarantee PTO
          • > 60% support replacing the Electoral College and FPTP voting

          But zero of those things are anywhere close to legislation because our congress is under the thumb of a dozen celebrity personalities and party flip floppers. The more diluted the voting power, the harder it is to make personal backroom deals and buy elections.

          Inflating the House doesn’t solve similar problems with the Senate or Executive + Judicial branches, but it’s better than nothing.