• thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Start with an automatic retirement age; no one over the age of 65 (for example) can serve as an elected representative.

    Honestly, the same should likely apply to voter eligibility - to be honest - but that’s a whole separate argument for another time.

    • praxispotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, and while we’re at it let’s disenfranchise the intellectually disabled as well. /sarcasm

      Personally I prefer term limits rather than an age cap because I’d rather see government represent everyone. If a 75-year-old manages to win an election by running a successful campaign, why shouldn’t they govern? But if they’re only in office because they ran unchallenged for 30 years… time to make room for change.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        The biggest issue with term limits is that it transfers agency away from elected officials, and empowers unelected staffers who will instead be the ones with all of the institutional knowledge on ‘how things are done’ - further entrenching the rot.

        By instead having an age restriction, it still allows for popular politicians to remain within Congress and transfer experience to newer members, while also incentivising politicians to plan long-term and focus on bettering things for future generations, as they will ultimately be the ones responsible for looking after things. After all, “a society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they will never sit under.”

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          We have a great case study in how effective term limits are at achieving good governance: California. It’s just as @thatKamGuy said-- it empowers party bureaucracies, advisors and civil servants at the expense of elected legislators.

          California’s governance did improve, but largely due to structural reforms to the budgeting process pushed through when Jerry Brown was governor. Term limits are a band-aid that doesn’t even stick properly.

      • YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Because if you’re not going to be around to see the consequences of the policies you supported maybe you shouldn’t be taking part in it.

        We don’t let children take part in the policies being made even though they will change their entire lives, but we do it because they aren’t informed enough for such decisions. Well guess what? Children are often smarter than people who are sun downing and while an old person only gets dumber as the years pass a child gets smarter.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          if you’re not going to be around to see the consequences of the policies you supported maybe you shouldn’t be taking part in it

          For example, if you’re termed out and leaving someone else to clean up your mess?