The biologists involved chose to host it on wordpress. That doesn’t change who signed the statement. Fuck’s sake.
If you’re talking about the SRY gene at this point, you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Chromosomes are how sex is determined, not how sex is defined. As linked to previously in the comment that you should have educated yourself with:
Most animals don’t have an SRY gene. Wow they must be sexless! Biologists in tatters, completely unable to explain what sex a chicken is!
Since you appear to require remedial help, note that that was sarcasm. Biologists can determine the sex of any anisogamous species, because of gametes. No other definition makes sense. You’re welcome to provide any source claiming that the consensus in the field of biology is something else. You can’t though.
For anybody following along, note the common playbook of spewing bullshit, while also never actually providing any real source. If they just really really want it to be true, then it must be true, right?
You’re literally wrong. Here’s a public statement that a bunch of biologists and other scientists have signed:
https://projectnettie.wordpress.com/
Do you have a source other than just “nuh uh :(”
first off, wordpress? ooo, authoritative! second, look up the SRY gene.
🤦🤦🤦
The biologists involved chose to host it on wordpress. That doesn’t change who signed the statement. Fuck’s sake.
If you’re talking about the SRY gene at this point, you have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. Chromosomes are how sex is determined, not how sex is defined. As linked to previously in the comment that you should have educated yourself with:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex-determination_system
Most animals don’t have an SRY gene. Wow they must be sexless! Biologists in tatters, completely unable to explain what sex a chicken is!
Since you appear to require remedial help, note that that was sarcasm. Biologists can determine the sex of any anisogamous species, because of gametes. No other definition makes sense. You’re welcome to provide any source claiming that the consensus in the field of biology is something else. You can’t though.
For anybody following along, note the common playbook of spewing bullshit, while also never actually providing any real source. If they just really really want it to be true, then it must be true, right?