• ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    4 days ago

    With Trump’s approval ratings so low, how does he keep ousting GOP rivals?

    Wrong question. This is like asking why some inmate is really popular in prison when everybody hates criminals.

    Trump can oust GOP candidates in GOP primaries because it’s the dum-dum club to begin with.

  • baronvonj@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Turnout in the primaries is incredibly low. So you get a very low representative sample of the electorate choosing the candidates, typically the most avid party loyal voters. So this drives the primary candidates to extremes. This is further exacerbated by gerrymandering, because the district is considered safe enough for the one part that the primary is basically the actual election.

    • ClownStatue@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      This right here is the answer. Plus, that low primary turnout is more likely to be composed of the diehards, so angry MAGA in this case. My hope is that some of those primary wins come back to bite the party in the ass in the elections, but I’m not holding my breath. So far, this country seems to prefer Trump’s bullshit chaos to whatever brand of “progressive” the Democrats are propping up. Sad thing is if the Dems do actually win big in November, they will take it as a sign that their milquetoast corporate-owned liberals are what the country wants, rather than just voting against the fascist racists they are running against.

          • baronvonj@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            3rd parties won’t be viable at the state or federal level without RC. or some other significant electoral reform. Over 99% of state and federal legislative seats are held by either Republican or Democratic nominees, and frequently an Independent or 3rd party incumbent won on the D/R ticket and then switched while in office. Not one EC vote for a 3rd party presidential candidate since 1968, and Perot won 19% of the national popular vote in 1992. We need to vote in the primaries to put progressives and pro-elecroral reform nominees on the ballot before we can effectively vote 3rds party beyond county level (unless you already have RCV).

    • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      This. My state had dismal primary turnout. Our good old boy, Regan-esque Republican incumbent governor won over his white nationalist challenger, but that win was carried by all those of us here who register Republican to vote in their primaries. He’s evil, but he’s a far more tolerable evil than his challenger. And that’s why our system is broken.

  • JailElonMusk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    Money from AIPAC, and support from fascists, cowards, and morons.

    That’s really what the state of our democracy is right now.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah I share a mailbox with a MAGA person and they get fundraising letters from various MAGA orgs like The Heritage Foundation almost every day. Some of them are pretty elaborate, like a 8.5x11 flat envelope with a huge glossy full color US flag on the front and back, or one that had what looked like a $1 bill inside.

      My Gmail also got subscribed to trump emails somehow, I marked them as spam but when I look in the spam box I see multiple emails every day with personal messages like “Donna, I am personally asking you to help.”

      Add to that church preachers that tell their flock to donate X% of their money to Christian causes like this and there is a LOT of money from wealthy old people going into the hands of MAGA.

  • godsammitdam@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    “Democracy” TM

    If not outright election fraud, it’s money used to spread info/misinfo. Like the voters who talked about the video they saw of Massie in a threesome with AOC and Ilhan Ohmar. AI generated out the wazoo.

    If it’s not money, it’s legal election fraud in red states where voters are suppressed, voter rolls are purged, etc etc.

    All of these things combined make for a great recipe of “democracy.” Combine that with the fact that conservatives are, quite literally, not hyperbolic, a terrorist death cult, they truly do follow the leader right off the cliff’s edge.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Winning inside the bubble is no challenge. Winning in the real world is what matters.

    In 2010, Republicans thought they were going to have a bloodbath Midterms against Obama, and they got a whole bunch of whack-job Tea Partiers (the proto-MAGAs) to win their primaries against incumbents. Then they got to the general election, and they all lost against normal Democrats, badly blunting the Republicans’ Midterms.

    MAGAs always have a plan, but it’s always a bad plan.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is stupid. We’re talking about primaries here and the approval rating among republicans are solid AF so yeah, Trump backed candidates are going to win because it’s a god damn cult.

    I’m sure that someone is going to go “BUT WHAT ABOUT OPEN PRIMARIES?” Come on, really? You think that Democrats or Independents are going to vote in a Republican primary in any numbers? You can barely get anyone to vote in a actual election much less a god damn primary of another party.

    Cultist are going to cult here.

    • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, non-Republicans will vote in Republican primaries if the strategy is there.

      My state is (now) firmly red. Whoever wins the Republican primary will almost certainly win the general. As such, voting for the least shitty Republican in the primary is far more useful than voting Democrat in the general. On top of that, at least my Democrat primaries have been very milquetoast. It doesn’t make much difference who wins that.

      That all makes it a very simple decision to vote in the R primary.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 days ago

        Uh huh… What state are you in? Let’s see how that goes, I’m sure there will be a record turn out in the Republican primary. I’ll be waiting here with bated breath.

        • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Bud, protest votes are a big thing in states with open primaries. Minimalizing the bullshittery and all that.

          I myself am in Texas and have up until a few years ago been a “Registered Republican” on the official books. I haven’t actually voted for anything remotely red since well before Obama. But that’s how the system works. When your state is cooked, you find a way to oppose it, inside or outside the system. We are finally hitting the point where what’s on the books vs what the actual sentiment is, it’s starting to finally matter.

          • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Uh huh… Sure looks like lots of people are sure using that open primary to affect Republican primaries in Texas. Glad that sane Republicans are winning races there…oh wait…

            • JustAnotherPodunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              I mean I got the less shitty sheriff out of the deal. The judge I wanted lost. A few years ago I got the better justice of the peace. There hasn’t been a dem contender in years for any of those positions. I would say I’ve done the proper and right thing. I have no actually affiliation with the gop but it has allowed me effectively fulfill my civic duty by helping elect the most fit local officials. My situation is not rare or unique.

              • Doublenut@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Get the feeling you’re responding to… not a person.

                That being said I’m in the same boat in GA. Registered independent.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    for Massey, this was mostly AIPAC money even more than they spent on previous primaries to defeat Cori Bush. The playbook for successful APAIC operation is to never mention Israel. Just smear opponent. Not sure how Massey primary was conducted, though.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would doubt this. I’d especially doubt that a winning campaign would be to promise to give all KY electricitity to a datacenter. AIPAC did make a victory tweet. I didn’t see campaigns, but I doubt it was focused on who loves AI the most.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    With approval ratings so low, how was Jim Jones able to convince 1000 people to drink poison?

    🙃

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s not really an answer. If it were, his approvals would be a lot higher. The question is why, despite low approval rates, people still listen to him.

      • BillyClark@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        You can use money to win elections even if people hate you. You can use some fake group to take credit for your political ads so people don’t know the money comes from you.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Okay, fake group makes positive political ads about you. Everyone still hates you. Why do they care about who you say they should vote for?

          • BillyClark@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            You’re using the word “you” to refer to different people.

            Okay, fake group makes positive political ads about you.

            Here, “you” refers to a candidate that the hated person supports. (And by the way, usually in these cases, the political ads are not positive about you, but negative about your opponent.)

            Everyone still hates you. Why do they care about who you say they should vote for?

            Here, “you” suddenly refers to the hated person themselves. People hate this person which is why the message uses a fake group to hide where the message is coming from.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              Here, “you” refers to a candidate that the hated person supports

              …huh? No, the candidate is the hated person. They’re the same person.

              • BillyClark@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                The article we’re discussing was prompted by Rep. Thomas Massie getting defeated in the primary by the candidate that Trump supports, Ed Gallrein.

                Massie is Trump’s GOP rival because he supported releasing the Epstein files, so Trump supported Ed Gallrein.

                The article goes on to list several other Republican politicians who have lost to the politician Trump backs.

                I don’t know how the topic could be any clearer. I can only assume you didn’t read the article.

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Yes, thank you for the recap. I’m not sure what part of this is confusing you.

                  E: Ah yes, the classic “Everyone I don’t understand is a troll!”

      • osanna@lemmy.vg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        And why the spineless democrats won’t fucking do something. Anything. About him.

  • LastWish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Isn’t his approval rating still solid amongst his base? Are the oustings happening in the pastures or in more competitive areas?

    • Laser@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      His base by definition approves of him, the more interesting question is whether that base changes in size

      • Ænima@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        What was republican voter turnout in these primaries, is what I’m interested in. How many turned out compared to the past might indicate the rats won because of fewer votes. If you plan to vote for a Democrat or Independent in the midterms, why would you want a good Republican candidate? If turnout this primary was lower, or much lower, compared to the past, that might point to something bigger come November.

        • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          As a citizen, I prefer the most competent people in both parties, because sometimes your opponent wins.

          • Ænima@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            No where did I ask or suggest they voted for the tRump pick or something. But if you were a MAGA buttsucker and have decided to finally be a human being in this society, why vote in the primary? It’s why I was asking about overall voter turnout for this primary compared to past primaries.

            • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              If you plan to vote for a Democrat or Independent in the midterms, why would you want a good Republican candidate?

    • Hapankaali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Exactly, his approval rating isn’t “low” at all. It’s 39%, well above the approval rating of, say, Merz (19%) or Macron (27%).

      • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        I dont know the historical approval ratings of leaders of Germany and France at various points in their terms, but not sure if this is an “apples to apples” comparison. Macron won 28% of the vote in the first round, and Merz had something like 24%. Your point may be fair, but Trump won 49.8% of the vote in his last election, so the decline looks a lot more dramatic.

  • _wizard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Call me a conspirisist but I’m of opinion that these are trial runs for rigged elections. Why not rig your own parties election as proof that you can do it bigger?

    • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      Agreed. He already gave away the playbook like day 1. Said there won’t be anymore red and blue states. Said you’ll never need to vote again. Guaranteed there will be no blue wave in November, but a surprise “win” for Republicans all around. They will use this to pretend they have the public’s support in moving forward with all the terrible shit they’ve had to slow down recently. They are not popular. Massie is incredibly popular right now for the Epstein files. Trump wanted him out and had his people make him go away. I’d bet if Massie demanded a hand count, the results would be different. Elections are going to be a compromised joke moving forward until he is dragged kicking and screaming from the Whitehouse. They will continue to hold all the branches of government and claim they are winning elections in a landslide. Pretending they have the support of the populace when they don’t.

  • BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fucking hell. These news sources are deliberately stupid… The reason for it is that there will always be a permanent group of followers who will be convinced all the time. So his most loyal will continue to primary Republicans who even have a whiff of centrism.