Idk. I dont think expanding and accepting the corrupt scrotus judges as equal to the others is enough.
I think the argument needs to be made that the words of the constitution “shall serve on good behavior” means litterally that, and that therefore all the current R appointees abdicated their positions long ago and their rulings are invalid.
When the judges try to rule that they are still judges and that they say it takes impeachment, it should be pointed out that, as regular citizens, they A, have to argue that in court as a plaintif, and that B, attempting to rule on a standard they directly benefit from is intrinsically corrupt behavior that constitutes having quit according to the exact words of the constitution.
Idk. I dont think expanding and accepting the corrupt scrotus judges as equal to the others is enough.
I think the argument needs to be made that the words of the constitution “shall serve on good behavior” means litterally that, and that therefore all the current R appointees abdicated their positions long ago and their rulings are invalid.
When the judges try to rule that they are still judges and that they say it takes impeachment, it should be pointed out that, as regular citizens, they A, have to argue that in court as a plaintif, and that B, attempting to rule on a standard they directly benefit from is intrinsically corrupt behavior that constitutes having quit according to the exact words of the constitution.
We honestly should organize as a citizenry, and encourage them to abdicate.