• pluge@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Oh wow, swinging?!? She’s so brave. Surely she’ll stick to her guns if she ever gets nominated…right??

    ffs get these establishment dems far, far away from the next election.

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      In another binary choice, who would you choose? Another trump, or harm reduction?

      (Count the people for whom evolution is confusing)

      • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s a false choice.

        We don’t have to be stuck with Harris as the only alternative to Trump. We could just as easily nominate someone who doesn’t suck.

        If we have the misfortune of once again being forced to choose between Trump or harm reduction, we will all know it’s because the Democratic leadership forced that choice on us. I don’t think they would be forgiven for that betrayal.

        • pluge@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “just as easily” if and only if the DNC doesn’t nuke the progressive option and force the Republican in sheeps clothing to take the nomination

      • noodles@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Definitely her over Trump, but she has to get past the primaries first, and we cannot forget that she ended up being a supremely feckless candidate on all the core voter issues that gave her momentum at the beginning of her abridged campaign.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        STFU about that until after the primary. It’s 100% inappropriate right now.