The coordinated effort worked. When lawmakers finalized Colorado SB26-051, they added Section 6-30-105(e) to the text. This specific clause waives compliance for operating systems and applications distributed under licenses that allow copying, modifying, and redistributing without platform-imposed technical restrictions. Why the Section 6-30-105(e) Exemption Protects Decentralized Tech

This exemption establishes a formal legislative precedent for the tech industry. It legally shields free and open-source operating systems from hardware-level age attestation laws that closed ecosystems like iOS and Windows will soon have to follow.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    There is a very easy way to force linux users to enforce this. However, I won’t give it away here, because as far as I can tell the current law makers are clueless.

    And I don’t want to give them clues.

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 hours ago

      There isn’t an easy way. There may be a way to enforce it when you connect to a remote site, but that requires the remote computer to implement it, not you.

    • potatoguy@mbin.potato-guy.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m already seeing that in a year or two, we’re getting blocked on websites or electron applications because of age verification just like in android with Google Play Services. Like use age verification software or get blocked for 99% the internet.

      They don’t even need to turn it into law.

    • SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Our current law makers are still debating if freeing the slaves was a good idea. That’s how far behind they are.

    • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m going to argue that you share it because one thing you can count on is very determined nerds to defeat it.

      Every time legislators tried to enforce some sort of dystopian thing, developers saw it as damage and routed around it.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        You’re not wrong, security through obscurity eventually fails. In this case however, time counts, the longer it can be cut off, the more chance of some sanity returning, of backlash building politically. The time to route around is after a law is made, preferably as flawed a law as possible.