• psycho_driver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The problem I see with shorter terms is more opportunity for a corrupt executive branch to pack the court with corrupt, or at least highly political, justices. With 18 year terms they could be staggered out so one justice every 2 years would reach the end of their term and need to be replaced, limiting that to 2 justices per presidential term.

    • bss03@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      But, with shorter terms, they also get reviewed/replaced more often, in fact with 9 year terms, they get at most 2 executives / 2 senates safe.