Its always good to try!

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        GrapheOS doesn’t like anyone. I don’t even think they should be treated as part of open phone community. They are hostile to everything that they didn’t make.

        • Nebby@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          They are hostile to those who dont genuinely care about privacy and security like fairphone and murena who also spend time spreading hate and disinformation about grapheneos and the devs and owner

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I all for spreading hate about graphene os devs* but I don’t think Fairphone is doing anything like that. Any proof?

            *Just kidding. I think they are toxic but and their opinions on many topics should be ignored but there’s no need to hate anyone.

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Their gripe seems more to do with eOS, but they kinda couple them together. Hardware-wise fairphone is only deficient in its security chip. I do agree with GrapheneOS in criticisms of eOS’s philosophy and security and privacy goals. The founder of eOS is a prick.

          • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            They are just saying that e/OS has delays of important updates that lag. Which the fairphine team then pretty much confirmed.

            Am I a dick for pointing out factual information? Are they? When it comes to something like security and privacy there should be no compromises. The truth should be heard.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            the graphene people never fail to stir pot. lol

            they not wrong, but there’s better ways to inform other people.

            • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Yes, and I don’t know if it could even be classed as a collaboration. They just buy them and resell them with different firmware, basically?

              I assume some part of acceptance is required for that in practice, but it isn’t like Fairphone ever advertised them as an official option (as far as I can tell or saw).

              • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                So instead of seeing an opportunity to do the same, they burned bridges with one of the only companies not locking down their OS?

                • Jako302@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Security wise Fairphone isn’t up to GOS standards, so a collaboration wasn’t on the table either way.

                  If said standards are reasonable is a difficult thing to say. A few years ago I would’ve said that a normal person doesn’t need to be concerned that the police tries to break into their phone, but with the current state of things and the increasing rise of fascism, I’m not so certain anymore.

              • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Well, Fairphone sells phones with e/OS preinstalled on their website so at the very least they like each other

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Sure would be the toppiest of tops!

      We can encourage them to work together in their official communication channels too!

      Would be good for both of them on every level. GrapheneOS learning to make their own phones, and Fairphone learning to make an OS while both being partnered

      Edit: Be the change you want to see everybody!! Flood the gates with what we want!

      • thomasshikari@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Graphene already has a partnership with Motorola now so the assumption is some time (I’ve seen 2027 speculated) we may get a Graphene Phone from Motorola. Mixed feelings about them partnering with a company like that but we’ll see how it goes. I still keep thinking about finally getting a secondhand pixel 10 so I can switch to Graphene from apple.

        • viov@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I would recommend it. Very worth it overall (As a user of a similar Pixel phone)

          What are your use cases?

      • illi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Afaik Fairphone is not interested in implementing some security features that GrapheneOS people consider a deal breaker

        • viov@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I wonder why they don’t want to, its not really in Fairphones to not do that

          • skarn@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            They are talking about specific hardware features. Which would of course be great, but you can imagine how they are not exactly at the toppiest toppy top of Fairphone’s priorities, when they are still struggling to be taken seriously by your mainstream Android buyer.

            Consider that every hardware features is extra hard for Fairphone, on account of their very specific commitments to materials sourcing, labor practices, and longer term support.

            They are a company with a lot of very complicated demands, for a still very low volume of sold devices. They need to pick their battles, and clearly being blessed by the church of Graphene can’t be that high a priority.