Its always good to try!

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      GrapheOS doesn’t like anyone. I don’t even think they should be treated as part of open phone community. They are hostile to everything that they didn’t make.

      • Nebby@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They are hostile to those who dont genuinely care about privacy and security like fairphone and murena who also spend time spreading hate and disinformation about grapheneos and the devs and owner

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I all for spreading hate about graphene os devs* but I don’t think Fairphone is doing anything like that. Any proof?

          *Just kidding. I think they are toxic but and their opinions on many topics should be ignored but there’s no need to hate anyone.

    • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Their gripe seems more to do with eOS, but they kinda couple them together. Hardware-wise fairphone is only deficient in its security chip. I do agree with GrapheneOS in criticisms of eOS’s philosophy and security and privacy goals. The founder of eOS is a prick.

        • Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          They are just saying that e/OS has delays of important updates that lag. Which the fairphine team then pretty much confirmed.

          Am I a dick for pointing out factual information? Are they? When it comes to something like security and privacy there should be no compromises. The truth should be heard.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          the graphene people never fail to stir pot. lol

          they not wrong, but there’s better ways to inform other people.

          • Creat@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yes, and I don’t know if it could even be classed as a collaboration. They just buy them and resell them with different firmware, basically?

            I assume some part of acceptance is required for that in practice, but it isn’t like Fairphone ever advertised them as an official option (as far as I can tell or saw).

            • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              So instead of seeing an opportunity to do the same, they burned bridges with one of the only companies not locking down their OS?

              • Jako302@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Security wise Fairphone isn’t up to GOS standards, so a collaboration wasn’t on the table either way.

                If said standards are reasonable is a difficult thing to say. A few years ago I would’ve said that a normal person doesn’t need to be concerned that the police tries to break into their phone, but with the current state of things and the increasing rise of fascism, I’m not so certain anymore.

            • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Well, Fairphone sells phones with e/OS preinstalled on their website so at the very least they like each other