• khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I use signal and I’m free to. I’m confident it’s secure. Confident enough that my wife can send me a titty pic without someone looking at it. I would not do that with WeChat.

    You call out a straw man about it being back doored when you’ve no idea that’s the case but we’re certain it is in China.

    You go ahead and try to create an end to end encrypted messaging platform there and see what happens.

    Hell… use pgp in your WeChat. See what happens.

    • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I use signal and I’m free to. I’m confident it’s secure. Confident enough that my wife can send me a titty pic without someone looking at it.

      I hate to break it to you but if the government want to see that titty pic if it’s on either of your phones or any other device they can and likely have.

      You call out a straw man about it being back doored when you’ve no idea that’s the case but we’re certain it is in China.

      Again remember snowden? If you live in the western hemisphere the US and Israeli intelligence apparatus owns all of your tech that’s the unfortunate truth you need to reckon with.

      • khannie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I hate to break it to you but if the government want to see that titty pic if it’s on either of your phones or any other device they can and likely have.

        If we work off the assumption that signal is secure then not without a court order where I live.

        Not quite the same in China.

        Edit: Awwww. The mods are removing my posts now. Bless their fragile hearts.

        Since that’s happening I’m out now. It’s been an interesting discussion though I fundamentally disagree that surveillance there is the same as everywhere else. I’ve made my points. Catch you again o/

            • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              It’s clearly true you are just stating things that are untrue but you feel must be because you are a chauvinist. And you are an idiot as you look past the very clearly documented history of the EuroAmerikan surveillance apparatus and pretend it’s not real and if it is real it’s bound by your laws etc etc. Hence you are a chauvinist and an idiot.

                • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Fallacy fallacy. So epic owned. Fucking loser Reddit debate bro. Genuinely impressively arrogant while being so uninformed and apparently genuinely unintelligent.

        • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Yes the EuroAmerican intelligence apparatus famous for obeying court orders and never being outed by whistleblowers for running massive illegal spying and data harvesting operations. Are you trolling?