• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The packs CATL makes now are 175Whr/kg which is very close to LFP. They’re already EV-worthy.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      That’s great but emerging technologies are shooting for double or triple that amount, so why switch to something thats just barely reaching the equivalent potential of what’s already old news?

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What EVs don’t work in cold weather? Cheaper for the manufacturer for sure, and potentially safer though its not as if EV fires are some major epidemic.

          • phx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            At a significant loss, yes. When it was really cold here that was about 30-40%

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I imagine vastly lower cost would be one reason. 450km range chargeable in 11 minutes would be enough for a significant proportion of people and likely desirable if the cost is low enough. I don’t think it’s likely that lithium would match the price/perf ratio of sodium so I think we’re likely to see a lot more sodium in applications that don’t require the absolute best energy density. So in a way, sodium might be the front runner, ahead of advanced lithium, in terms of what’s going to be adopted. 😅

        E: Also we’re talking sodium batteries in production. If and when double-triple density lithium or another shows up, it might change the calculus depending on price, safety, etc.