Democrats spent the last year asking where their Joe Rogan was. Hasan Piker is one of the few left-wing figures with the audience they covet — but the party is deeply hostile to the spontaneity and independence that make figures like him appealing.

  • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Because of the way the US electoral system works

    Which you perpetuate by yelling at people, and trying to discourage them from vote third party. If every single person that was fed up, balled up and voted third party, then shit would change. But nah, you keep screaming at them and confusing them.

    Not me. You don’t confuse me or scare me. :)

    LOL. I did say those things back then, and yet I’m still here. QED.

    I doubt you said those things in Oct and Nov of 2024. But hey if ya did, and managed to not get banned, good for ya. But lots of people were heavily brigaded and banned for saying stuff like that in October 2024.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Which you perpetuate by yelling at people, and trying to discourage them from vote third party. If every single person that was fed up, balled up and voted third party, then shit would change. But nah, you keep screaming at them and confusing them.

      And if my grandma had wheels she’d be a bicycle.

      Expecting a third party to win a US presidential election was straight-up delusional. Even when it’s Theodore fucking Roosevelt it still doesn’t happen! And that was someone with the name-recognition and supporter base of having already been President before!!!

      The only way a third party could become viable is if voting reform happened first, by replacing one of the two major parties from within and getting it passed.

      I discourage voting third party in the presidential general election! because it is objectively fucking moronic.

      Not me. You don’t confuse me or scare me. :)

      Refusing to be dissuaded from being objectively wrong isn’t something to brag about.

      I doubt you said those things in Oct and Nov of 2024.

      Fine, if we’re going to stop believing each other, then I think you were lying about being doxxed and have a gang-stalking delusion. Happy now?

      But lots of people were heavily brigaded and banned

      Another motte-and-bailey fallacy, BTW.

      • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        My position then, was (paraphrased) “harris sucks, but vote for her anyway because the alternative is worse.” And that was true.

        Well yeah, because you added you little disclaimer. Imagine if you didn’t have that disclaimer, you’d have had a much different reaction. lol

        I proudly voted third party then, and I’ll proudly vote third party again if democrats keep making the same mistakes.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          (BTW, I edited my comment to delete that line because I posted it before completing the thought. But thank you for quoting it, because now I have a chance to address it in a less unwieldy wall of text.)

          Well yeah, because you added you little disclaimer. Imagine if you didn’t have that disclaimer, you’d have had a much different reaction. lol

          By “little disclaimer,” do you mean the “but vote for her anyway because the alternative was worse” part? No shit I wrote that every time, because that was the main part of my point! It wasn’t some sly tactic to appease the mods; it was the important thing I was trying to convey to people like you!

          Anyway, what I meant to continue with is this: I don’t think I was alone in having that attitude. In fact, I claim that many, if not most, of the people you characterize as full-throated Harris supporters trying to censor you were actually very reluctantly Harris-voting progressives and leftists desperately trying to get you to stop making the worst possible outcome happen.

          • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            No shit I wrote that every time, because that was the main part of my point!

            And also the part that kept you from getting your comments removed and censored. Which is my main point. Lemmy should be open enough not to remove comments (unless outright hate and/or illegal) just because someone has a different view on things.

            Luckilly, that’s changed lately. I see a huge shift turning. Not it’s not nearly as controversial or ban-worthy to say ya like third parties and will vote that way.

            In fact, I claim that many, if not most, of the people you characterize as full-throated Harris supporters trying to censor you were actually very reluctantly Harris-voting progressives and leftists desperately trying to get you to stop making the worst possible outcome happen.

            And I can be on board for that. What I am not on board is the hate, and the ban hammer. Disagree with me and say so, cool. Calling me a nazi and racist though, not so cool. The amount of censorship, i.e. removing comments and banning was uncalled for. I legit got banned from several different instances. Yet, I didn’t say anything more controversial than what you and I have been discussing and saying in this thread.

            To your point, yeah, it was a different time in 2024. My point is that it should never have been that way. Lemmy should be better. Again, it is getting better about that now.

            The great thing about Lemmy, and the reason I am still here, is because of the idea that one person or group can’t permaban you from all of Lemmy. So I was able to start fresh and avoid the doxxers (yes, I had three, but I suspect was same person, so…) and the downvote brigaders.

            Now I have several different usernames on several different instances. So I’m def gonna be here thru next election cycle too. lol

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Lemmy should be open enough not to remove comments (unless outright hate and/or illegal) just because someone has a different view on things.

              You are entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts. I’m glad when people suffer consequences for posting misinformation or otherwise act in bad faith.

              And I can be on board for that. What I am not on board is the hate, and the ban hammer. Disagree with me and say so, cool. Calling me a nazi and racist though, not so cool.

              Nazi is as nazi does. Doing things that further the objectives of nazis makes you their ally. If you don’t like being accurately described that way, stop helping the nazis!

              • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                but you are not entitled to your own facts.

                But me saying that I didn’t like Harris so I chose to vote third party, is not giving false facts. So I shouldn’t have been censored. If you think that is worthy of censorship, then that says a lot about you. lol

                Nazi is as nazi does. Doing things that further the objectives of nazis makes you their ally. If you don’t like being accurately described that way, stop helping the nazis!

                Sigh…and so it begins. I’m not a nazi just because I voted third party. lol I’m glad you are saying this in this thread tho, so people can see what it’s like.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  But me saying that I didn’t like Harris so I chose to vote third party, is not giving false facts.

                  The notion that third parties are viable in the Presidential election – especially when it’s only a month or two away and most people don’t have a clue who the third-party candidates even are! – is 100% misinformation.

                  • PapaSkwat@lemmy.wtf
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    The notion that third parties are viable in the Presidential election – especially when it’s only a month or two away and most people don’t have a clue who the third-party candidates even are! – is 100% misinformation.

                    I never said anything of the sort. I said I was proud to vote third party, and I’m still proud to. And I will in the next election too. :)