• brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wouldn’t have got damaged if you left that shit at home and stopped fucking with people.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    As the title says, its clearly just “damaged”, not “lost” or “destroyed”, right. The front part and the very back edge of the tail look perfectly fine-- just dirty is all. Shouldnt be counted as a loss, merely in need of repair. Our fleet of AWACS remains at 16.

    /s

  • waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Not old enough to remember, but did the us have similar losses during Bush’s war? Or is the military just completely incompetent now under the leadership of a bunch of pedos

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sort of. Iraq couldn’t hit back like this, but the US certainly suffered more losses over the entire war, just because of the duration.

      Iraq didn’t have the equipment, training, or motivation to really resist the overwhelming US and coalition forces. Iran is better-equipped, better-trained, and has an almost fanatical devotion to the Ayatollah, especially in the IRGC. Iran is also upwards of 90% Shia, while Saddam was Sunni and repressed the ~60% Shia and Kurdish population.

      • Pholous@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Also Trump’s USA neither has a real coalition nor a foothold to launch an army from into Iran.

      • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        almost fanatical devotion to the Ayatollah, especially in the IRGC

        Well the US has a fanatical devotion to their pedo king, especially amongst maga, so much in common, they even prey to the sane god.

        • ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Bruh, we’re invading the Fremen. This is how Trump burns down US military infrastructure the same as Russia did theirs.

          Way to leave China as the undisputed world power there.

    • philpo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Which one? The first Bush-Iraq war? Yep. Not as blatant,but generally yeah.

      The second one? Nope, the country pretty much was in shambles already.

      • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        The second one? Nope, the country pretty much was in shambles already.

        Coalition losses during 1991 Desert Storm were around 300. For the 2003 invasion and occupation, the losses were of about 5000. Though I think they lost more aircraft during the former.

    • rwrwefwef@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      To put it simply, the US did lose more troops and equipment in 1991 and 2003 than currently, but also achieved their objectives, so to speak.

      Then again, the 1991 war was a real war with with close to 1 million troops taking part. Currently, what we have is basically two countries lobbing missiles at each other.

      Ironically, in 1991, it was the US that was using drones against Iraq. Tables have kinda turned.