You must log in or register to comment.
“I fear no man. But that thing, it scares me.”
There’s only one thing worse than a rapist
I don’t see a call to
fork(), so there’s clearly no child here.bool isChild() { pid_t result= fork() return (result == 0) }Nope. The check should be in a while loop
23-19! 23-19!
🧦
Correct code:
int getAge() { return 6578; }Six seven
Found the child.
Or the hip soccer mom
Le Website: Wow, what are the odds this person using MY WEBSITE was born in 1900 on January 1st? They must be the oldest person in the world!
Le me: is 14
42069
def verify_age(u: User) -> bool: return hasattr(u, "age") and u.age is not NoneUnacceptable. All my friends are None
*to the tune of California Dreamin’*
Troll em with a >
deleted by creator
Anything under 25 should be considered a child.
The reason that 25 number came up is that’s how old the cohort they were studying brain development got when their funding was cut. There’s no reason to not believe brains continue developing all our lives, or that even if that study did find a “cut off point” that it would be the same from person to person.
There seems to be a real tendency to want to narrow the band of what a functioning adult is, centered right around whatever age the poster happens to be at.
sure, not like people under 25 need to work, pay rent, take care of their own finances and responsibilities, or anything. we’re all just kids living with our parents and when we turn 25, we magically become adults! oh, wait…
I just find the arbitrary line drawn at 18 to be ridiculous. So, the second you turn 18 you magically become an adult. OK.
And now it’s time to judge societies that decide 16 means adult, or 20 means adult, or 25 means adult.
Was it the US that just decided for us that “18 means your adult”? Why should they get to decide that? Based on what criteria?
Anyone > 65 should be considered senile until proven different. After all, it’s not kids that get scammed out of their retirement funds.
That’s not my opinion, but it might lead to changes.
Kids don’t have retirement funds. If they did, and they had free access to them, they would definitely get scammed out of them.
That’s pretty much what I wrote, just lacking the sarcasm.
Possession of money is literally the definition of scammed.
