• ChristerMLB@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Maybe, but a centrist will not actually address the underlying issues that make actors like AfD, and the Trump-wing of the Republican party, get bigger and bigger.

    To put it differently: a Bill Clinton-type might manage to get elected and be popular, but he wouldn’t do anything to keep inequality from rising even more.

    • panthera_@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Incorrect. Merz adopted a stricter stance on immigration but not as harsh as the AfD party. Likewise, a centrist Democrat could be tough on border security but give migrants already here a path to citizenship. Inequality can never be completely eliminated because people aren’t equal in talent.

      • ChristerMLB@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Merz adopted a stricter stance on immigration but not as harsh as the AfD party. Likewise, a centrist Democrat could be tough on border security but give migrants already here a path to citizenship.

        This has no bearing on what I said, I’ll repeat myself:

        a centrist will not actually address the underlying issues that make actors like AfD, and the Trump-wing of the Republican party, get bigger and bigger.

        Inequality can never be completely eliminated because people aren’t equal in talent

        Nobody is talking about completely eliminating inequality

        We are where we are because we’ve allowed inequality to increase every year since the mid-'70s. Allowing that to continue - especially without establishing an actually leftist alternative (New Deal Democrat or democratic socialist at the least) - will just make the populist right bigger and more extreme.