Organizers of the upcoming “No Kings” rally in Helena say that a new state rule banning permits for weekend rallies on the Capitol grounds violates their First Amendment rights. State officials countered that the new rule, quietly instituted just last month, was intended to save money.

The update to permitting guidelines on the Montana.gov site, which has not been previously reported, states that public events requiring a permit “may only occur on weekdays and between the hours of 7 a.m. and 6 p.m., excluding holidays.”

The revisions apply to all state-owned or leased spaces or grounds at the Capitol Complex. The policy requires a permit for any public event that uses “state resources, requires setup of any structures, materials, displays, or requires clean-up.” A public event is defined as “any event that is open to the public and to which the public will have full access.”

  • nymnympseudonym@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I have been the person on multiple occasions who goes to the State Capitol and the City Police and puts his name on the documents that says we’re going to have a large gathering please give us a permit.

    It’s a reasonable thing to require, when they’re being reasonable – for example, the city might want the big Pro-Racism rally to be on a different day than the Armed Antifa rally.

    But if they’re obviously doing it Because They Can:

    1. You get lawyers and start filing motions
    2. Average people can always show up, local laws apply but it will be hard to stop random people from, eg, walking around the block on a public sidewalk
    3. Local officials will escalate and further violate peoples’ rights. Make sure people know to keep calm, and record everything for the judge to view later .
    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Frankly, I think the very first time any government started to demand a “permit” or designate a “free speech zone,” it should’ve triggered massive protests that were pointedly unpermitted and outside the zone.

      Your job should not exist, as a matter of principle.