cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/33264

US military investigators have said it is likely its forces were responsible for a strike on a girls’ school in Iran that killed scores of children and has been condemned as a war crime, according to a report by Reuters.​

The attack on the Minab girls’ school in southern Iran on Saturday is believed to have killed at least 165 people, mostly children under the age of 12.

​The UN’s education agency, Unesco, said the attack was a “grave violation of humanitarian law”.

​US war secretary Pete Hegseth said on Wednesday that the military was investigating the incident. Investigators have not reached a final conclusion and it is still unclear what evidence contributed to their assessment, Reuters reported, citing two unnamed officials.

It was also unclear what type of munitions were used and who was responsible, the outlet said.

An investigation by news outlet Middle East Eye determined that the attack on the school was a “double tap” strike – where a target is hit a second time in order to kill rescuers who come to the aid of the injured.

“When the first bomb hit the school, one of the teachers and the principal moved a group of students to the prayer hall to protect them,” a Red Crescent medic told the outlet, citing conversations he had with survivors.

“The principal called the parents and told them to come and pick up their children. But the second bomb hit that area as well. Only a small number of those who had taken shelter survived.”

​The UK has joined the war on Iran – which is illegal because it was not approved by the UN or US congress – by allowing the use of its bases for strikes against the country.

Prime minister Keir Starmer has claimed the UK’s involvement is an act of self-defence, despite the fact the US and Israel started the war.


From Novara Media via This RSS Feed.

  • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Don’t involve AI here. If they admitted plain and simple they did it on porpoise, there wouldn’t be consequences either.

          • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I won’t blame autocorrect, English is not my main language and I don’t think I can write purpose right without cheating. Maybe I pronounce it wrong, but what I say when I read purpose is nothing like what it should be.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Ahh, fair enough. It was a bad joke anyway, on my part.

              If you have an accent that is probably what tripped up the TTS. The words purpose and porpoise are said remarkably similarly in certain accents.