It wouldn’t be the first time the USA has employed the “Imma strike you, but if you strike back you’re a peace hating savage” tactic. They’ve done it several times already. For any country that acts diplomatically in good faith, it puts you in quite a tough spot. If you strike back (especially if you strike back harder), then you’re risking escalations, but if you do nothing, then your enemy has gotten a free strike in.
🇮🇷🇮🇱| Intense air defense activity over Zanjan, Iran
I remember when I worked with kids and they’d throw a snowball at me and then run into the “no-snowfights-area”. Takes me back.
Come on… This can’t be true. The yanks must have known that Iran would strike back.
It would be very funny and I hope that it is true. I just don’t think it.
It wouldn’t be the first time the USA has employed the “Imma strike you, but if you strike back you’re a peace hating savage” tactic. They’ve done it several times already. For any country that acts diplomatically in good faith, it puts you in quite a tough spot. If you strike back (especially if you strike back harder), then you’re risking escalations, but if you do nothing, then your enemy has gotten a free strike in.
the fact they called it everywhere a “pre-emptive” attack says it all when Iran had not intention whatsoever of starting this conflict
Things going well, then
Any other sources for this?