The motto is carved into the institution
itself for the increase and diffusion of
knowledge. That’s the founding mandate
of the Smithsonian Institution signed
into law by President James K. Pulk on
August the 10th, 1846. Funded entirely
by the estate of a British scientist
named James Smithson who never once set
foot in America. A man who left his
entire fortune to a country he’d never
visited so it could build a temple
dedicated to one thing. Knowledge. The
preservation of it. the sharing of it,
the protection of it for all of
humanity. I want you to hold that phrase
in your mind, the increase and diffusion
of knowledge, because everything I’m
about to show you is a direct
contradiction of those seven words. I’ve
spent the last several weeks following
the trail I uncovered in my last
investigation. The giant skeletons
reported in newspapers across America
throughout the 1800s.
Hundreds of accounts, mainstream
publications, credible sources, all
describing the same thing. Bones of
extraordinary size unearthed from mounds
and burial sites from Ohio to
California. And every single account
ends the same way. The remains were sent
to the Smithsonian Institution for
further study. That sentence, that exact
sentence, it appears in report after
report after report. And it’s always the
last line, always. Because after the
bones arrive in Washington, the story
stops. No follow-up study published, no
findings released, no display mounted,
just silence. [snorts] So, I started
asking a very simple question. What
happened when the bones got there? And
the answer I found is worse than
anything I expected. Not because of what
the Smithsonian did, but because of the
system they built to make sure no one
could ever prove it. Let me start with
something most people don’t know. The
Smithsonian today holds over 157 million
items in its collections. That number is
real, verified, published on their own
website. But here’s what they mention
quietly and hope you don’t think about
too carefully. Only about 1% of that
collection is on display at any given
time. 1%. That means over 105 million
objects sit in storage facilities,
vaults, climate controlled warehouses,
and restricted archive rooms that the
public has never seen and likely never
will. The largest of these is the museum
support center in Sutland, Maryland.
Five massive buildings they call pods,
each roughly the size of a three-story
football field. 435,000
square ft of storage containing 54
million items. The Department of
Anthropology collections are housed
there. The National Anthropological
Archives are housed there. The Human
Studies Film Archives are housed there.
It is not open to the public. Access to
the biological anthropology collections
requires a special human remains
research approval form submitted at
least 90 days in advance and subject to
additional review and approvals beyond
the standard process. Restricted access
layered inside restricted access.
And here’s the detail that stopped me
cold. The Smithsonian Institution is not
subject to the Freedom of Information
Act. It is technically classified as a
trust instrumentality of the United
States, not a federal agency. You cannot
file a foyer request with the
Smithsonian. They operate under their
own internal disclosure policy,
Smithsonian Directive 87, which means
the Smithsonian decides what the
Smithsonian releases. They are the
gatekeeper and the gate, the judge and
the evidence locker. and they have been
for nearly 180 years
now. Let me take you back to January 24,
1865. A bitter cold afternoon in
Washington. Joseph Henry, the first
secretary of the Smithsonian, is working
in his second floor office inside the
iconic castle building on the National
Mall. He hears a crackling above his
head. Within minutes, the building is
engulfed. A stove pipe had been inserted
into a wall cavity instead of a flu days
earlier. Embers had been smoldering
inside the walls undetected. When the
fire finally broke through, it consumed
the picture gallery, the apparatus room,
the lecture hall, the regent’s room, and
Henry’s entire office. Destroyed in
hours were over 200 irreplaceable oil
paintings of Native American leaders by
artist John Mick Stanley. All of James
Smithson’s personal effects, his
manuscripts, his minerals, his
scientific notes gone. Nearly 100,000
letters and reports documenting the
institution’s first two decades of
research, every piece of founding
correspondence, every early intake
record, every collection log from 1846
to 1865, all of it ash. The New York
Times called it a national calamity. And
I want you to understand why this
matters for everything that comes next.
When researchers today ask the
Smithsonian to account for specific
items received during those first 19
years, the answer is always the same. We
have no records, not because they were
never created, because they burned. In a
building dedicated to the preservation
of knowledge, the foundational records
of that knowledge were destroyed. And
there is no independent way to verify
what walked through those doors and what
didn’t during the Smithsonian’s most
formative years. But the real story
begins in 1879 when Congress creates the
Bureau of Ethnology within the
Smithsonian and appoints a man named
John Wesley Powell as its director.
Powell was a Civil War veteran who lost
his right arm at the Battle of Shiloh.
He was famous for leading the first
expedition down the Colorado River
through the Grand Canyon. He was
brilliant, ambitious, politically
connected, and he had a very specific
vision of what American history was
supposed to look like. In 1882, Congress
gave power 5,000 and a direct mandate.
Investigate the mound builders.
Thousands of massive earthwork
structures stretched across the eastern
United States from the Great Lakes to
the Gulf of Mexico. Enormous burial
mounds, some containing chambers,
vaults, artifacts of copper and mica,
and unknown alloys. And inside many of
them, bones. Bones that didn’t match
anything in the established record. The
American public was captivated. Who
built these structures? What
civilization existed here before? What
happened to them?
Pal’s answer was decided before the
investigation began. He appointed a man
named Cyrus Thomas to lead the division
of mound exploration. Thomas was an
entomologist, a bug specialist, not an
archaeologist, not an anthropologist. A
man who studied insects given authority
over the most significant archaeological
question in American history. Thomas
spent 12 years on the project and
published his conclusions in 1894.
Over 700 pages that said exactly what
Powell wanted them to say. Native
Americans built the mounds. No lost
civilization. No anomalous remains. No
further questions necessary. Case
closed. But Pal didn’t just close the
case on the mounds. He closed the door
on an entire category of inquiry. He
issued directives through the bureau
declaring that no anthropological
research should consider theories of
lost tribes or pre-Colombian contact
with other civilizations. He wrote that
any pictographic or artifactual evidence
from before Columbus was, and this is
his word, illegitimate for historical
purposes. Think about what that means.
The director of the Smithsonian’s
anthropology division declared that
evidence predating a specific date was
inadmissible, not because it was
examined and found lacking, because it
was categorically excluded from
consideration. He didn’t investigate and
find nothing. He decided what the
conclusion would be and then constructed
the investigation to confirm it. And the
Bureau of Ethnology under his authority
actively encouraged people across the
country to send their mound discoveries
to Washington. This was official
Smithsonian policy. dig something up,
ship it to us, we’ll study it." So they
did. Farmers, railroad workers,
construction crews, local historians,
they boxed up bones and artifacts and
sent them east. The Smithsonian’s own
1883 field team, led by professors
Norris and Thomas, excavated 50 mounds
in West Virginia and documented in their
own report a skeleton measuring 7 1/2 ft
tall adorned with heavy copper
bracelets. They found a circle of 10
skeletons surrounding another oversized
skeleton inside a burial chamber. They
cataloged underground vaults containing
copper ornaments, micer ceremonial
objects. These details appear in the
Bureau of Ethnology’s own annual
reports, except here’s what I found when
I compared early editions to later
printings. The size descriptions were
edited. References to unusual dimensions
were softened or removed entirely. The
same report published by the same
institution told a different story
depending on when you read it. The early
version documents something
extraordinary. The later version makes
it ordinary. Same data, different
narrative. Then in 1903, the Smithsonian
hired the man who would become the most
consequential gatekeeper in American
archaeological history, Alles Hordicker,
curator of physical anthropology.
a position he would hold for nearly four
decades until 1941. Herdicker’s
institutional policy was absolute. There
was no race of giants. There never had
been. Every report of oversized skeletal
remains was the product of amateur error
and public credility. His standard
explanation was that untrained people
measured thigh bones incorrectly,
holding the femur against the outside of
the leg without accounting for the hip
socket, and therefore overestimated
height by several inches. a reasonable
critique in isolation. But Herdlicker
didn’t apply reasonable critique. He
applied blanket dismissal. Hundreds of
documented reports from dozens of states
spanning half a century, all waved away
with a single explanation. And the bones
themselves already in the Smithsonian’s
possession, already beyond public
access, already filed in the restricted
collections that Hericker himself
oversaw. But here’s what makes this so
much darker than simple academic
stubbornness. In 2023, the Washington
Post published a major investigation
into Hoodlicker’s legacy. What they
uncovered should disturb anyone who
trusts the Smithsonian’s historical
judgment. Hoodlicker was an active
proponent of eugenics. He believed in
the biological superiority of white
Europeans. Under his direction, the
Smithsonian amassed over 30,700
human body parts, including 255 brains,
most collected without the consent of
the individuals or their families. He
traveled repeatedly to Kodiak Island in
Alaska where he paid Aluti children 10
cents each to dig up human bones from
indigenous graves. He shipped over
thousand sets of remains from a single
community back to Washington. In August
of 2023, Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie
Bunch publicly apologized for what he
called abhorrent and dehumanizing work
carried out under the Smithsonian’s
name. This is the man who decided which
bones were real and which were mistakes.
This is the man who determined what was
anomalous and what was normal for four
consecutive decades. A man whose racial
theories have been formally discredited,
whose collection methods have been
officially condemned, whose ethical
standards were so bankrupt that his own
institution had to issue a public
apology over a century later. And yet
his conclusions about anomalous skeletal
remains, his blanket denial, his
categorical dismissal of hundreds of
documented findings that still stands as
the Smithsonian’s official position. No
one has revisited it. No one has
reopened the files. No one has pulled
the bones from the restricted pods in
Sutland and measured them again with
modern equipment and unbiased eyes. I
want to be honest about something here
because credibility matters more than
spectacle. In 2014, a satirical website
published a fake article claiming the
Smithsonian admitted to destroying
thousands of giant skeletons and that
the Supreme Court forced them to release
classified documents. It was fiction,
complete fabrication from a site that
publishes madeup stories for clicks. But
it went viral. Millions of people shared
it as fact. And it did something
incredibly effective, whether
intentionally or not. It poisoned the
well. Now, anyone who raises legitimate
questions about the Smithsonian’s
handling of anomalous remains gets
associated with a debunked internet
hoax. The fake story became a shield.
You can’t ask real questions because
someone once asked fake ones. And I’ll
concede something else. 19th century
newspapers exaggerated. Yellow
journalism was rampant in the 1880s and
1890s. Not every giant skeleton report
should be taken as gospel. Some were
likely hoaxes. Some were misidentified
animal bones. Some were genuine
measurement errors exactly as Herdlicker
described. But that’s not the question.
The question isn’t whether every single
report was accurate. The question is why
the Smithsonian’s own field teams
documented unusual remains in official
reports and then those descriptions were
altered in subsequent publications. The
question is why prior to 1990, the
Smithsonian collected over 18,000 Native
American skeletal remains and still
holds approximately 10,000 today, stored
in facilities the public cannot access,
cataloged under systems the public
cannot search, gov, earned by disclosure
policies the public cannot challenge.
The question is why the institution that
holds the evidence also controls who
examines the evidence under rules. It
writes and enforces itself. Here’s the
timeline that keeps me awake. 1879,
Powell takes control of the Bureau of
Ethnology. 1882, the Mound Survey begins
with its conclusion already written.
1894, Cyrus Thomas publishes 700 pages,
confirming what Pal decided 12 years
earlier. 1903, hard liquor takes over
physical anthropology and institutes a
policy of categorical denial. By the
1920s, newspaper reports of anomalous
skeletal discoveries stop entirely. Not
because the discovery stopped, because
the reporting stopped, because the
pipeline had been perfected. Bones flow
in, silence flows out, discoveries enter
the institution and never emerge as
published findings. The public loses
interest because there’s nothing new to
report. And the collections grow quietly
in climate controlled darkness curated
by gatekeepers who answer to no external
authority. The same decades, the same
pattern I keep finding no matter which
thread I pull. Maps redrawn,
encyclopedias rewritten, physical
evidence collected and locked away by an
institution that was founded, literally
carved in stone to increase and diffuse
knowledge. So where did the knowledge
go? What’s in the 155 million items the
public has never seen? What did Herd
Licker’s team catalog and file in the
anthropology collections that no
independent researcher has examined
since? What’s in the restricted pods in
Sutland behind the 90-day approval
process and the additional review
requirements and the internal disclosure
policies and the foyer exemption that
makes the Smithsonian answerable to no
one but itself. I’m not claiming secret
vaults of forbidden artifacts. I’m
describing something worse. A system
where the institution that controls the
evidence also controls who sees it, who
studies it, who publishes on it, and
what conclusions are acceptable. That’s
not conspiracy. That’s institutional
architecture built over 80 years and
maintained through bureaucratic inertia
and professional gatekeeping. And when
you ask about it, when you point to the
edited reports, the missing specimens,
the restricted collections, the
ethically disgraced curator whose
conclusions still define the official
record, the answer is always the same.
Trust us, we’re the experts. Stop
asking. The Smithsonian was built to
increase and diffuse knowledge. But
somewhere between the founding and now,
between the castle fire and the pods in
Sutland, between Powell’s predetermined
conclusions and Herdlicker’s blanket
denials, the mission reversed. Knowledge
flowed in. And it never flowed back out.
The buildings remember, even if we
don’t. And somewhere in Sutland,
Maryland, in a climate control facility
the size of three football fields, the
bones remember, too. They’re just not
allowed to


You’re the person who posted it, how about you do it so viewing the post itself isn’t a fucking nightmare?
People shouldn’t have to scroll endlessly to just eventually get to someone in the comments fixing your shitty formatting that doesn’t fix the main issue with readability and length.