• mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The point isn’t that some models are better than others. The point is that yet again it’s an example that LLMs are not thinking machines and you can’t trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run a glorified auto complete.

      • Demdaru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Counterpoint: People are not thinking machines and you can’t trust anything from them and people are burning the world to run glorified slave labor.

        Truly we are AI of natural world xD

        • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Sure, fine, some get this right, and what else are they getting wrong? Something more serious and harder to spot?

          • Hackworth@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I agree that we should never treat these things as oracles. But how often they’re right/wrong does matter.

            • Gunrigger@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              how often they’re right/wrong does matter.

              That’s the wildest take I’ve heard on the question answering machine.

              • Grimy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                Most people get their info from forums and blog posts. Unless you limit yourself to nothing but peer reviewed papers, you probably do some kind of calculation on the legitimacy of whatever source you are perusing and verify it further if it’s something important.

  • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I mean the person asking the question doesn’t quite have it all there.

    If asked a question like that, I would give a similar answer. There’s no pointing out to the person how stupid of a question it is.

    • Jtee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’d have to be pretty fucking stupid to give a similar answer

      • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I feel like people forget what sass is.

        Give an extremely stupid question expect an equally stupid answer. How’s the person supposed to know anyways.

        And if you try to play “I’m only testing the system”, well I’m fucking your obvious test up, good luck. You aren’t smarter than the system, someone is fucking with you for fun.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I know at least a couple places (full handwash+detail) that could fit 100m walking from the parking area to the counter.

      I’m sure they wouldn’t like you to drive into the waiting room.