cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/55370711

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/55370708

Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny, who died in a remote Siberian prison two years ago, was almost certainly poisoned with a deadly toxin found in South American dart frogs, five European governments said Saturday.

A joint statement from Britain, France, Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands said they were “confident” Navanly had been poisoned after an analysis of samples taken from his body “conclusively confirmed the presence of epibatidine,” and that the Russian government was the likely culprit.

“Russia claimed that Navalny died of natural causes. But given the toxicity of epibatidine and reported symptoms, poisoning was highly likely the cause of his death. Navalny died while held in prison, meaning Russia had the means, motive and opportunity to administer this poison to him,” it continued.

The five countries said they were reporting the case to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, alleging Russia violated the Chemical Weapons Convention.

Russian authorities had previously claimed Navalny, 47, died of natural causes while serving several sentences totaling more than 30 years at a high-security prison above the Arctic Circle.

“Scientists from five European countries have established: my husband, Alexei Navalny, was poisoned with epibatidine—a neurotoxin, one of the deadliest poisons on earth. In nature, this poison can be found on the skin of the Ecuadorian dart frog. It causes paralysis, respiratory arrest, and a painful death,” she said.

“I was certain from the first day that my husband had been poisoned, but now there is proof: Putin killed Alexei with chemical weapon. I am grateful to the European states for the meticulous work they carried out over two years and for uncovering the truth. Vladimir Putin is a murderer. He must be held accountable for all his crimes.”

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said the poisoning shows that “Vladimir Putin is prepared to use chemical weapons against his own people to remain in power. France pays tribute to this opposition figure, killed for his fight in favor of a free and democratic Russia.”

British Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper added: "Only the Russian government had the means, the motive, and the opportunity to use that toxin against Alexei Navalny in prison. We are here today to shine a spotlight on the Kremlin’s barbaric attempt to silence Alexei Navalny’s voice.”

Russia announced Navalny’s death on Feb. 16, 2024, just as that year’s Munich Security Conference opened. On that day, Navalnaya delivered a speech, pledging that Putin “would pay for what they have done to our country, to my family, and to my husband.” After a weeklong dispute over custody, Russia released Navalny’s body to his mother.

  • freagle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    “The people I oppose.” Us vs them, the enemy.

    Uh. You literally set this up as “tankies” versus whatever you identify as. You set up the othering from the jump. You clearly oppose tankies. But you also clearly don’t understand anything about their positions.

    This thread immediately going to a bunch of shit the US did (which, to be clear, they absolutely did) is “How to think like a tankie 101.”

    Oh look, you did it again.

    You ignore the all of the content of the debate and you argue against its FORM. Your demand that everyone just ignore history when passing moral judgment is a major problem here. The reason “tankies” constantly raise up the history of what the US did is because it provides explanatory context for why certain actions are being taken by certain actors. When why plantation owners strung up uppity slaves, they all said things like “I can’t understand why that slave would have done something like that”, and then turn around and sell babies to rapists and torturers. A slave killing their master is open murder, but the context, I’m sure you would agree, actually matters.

    If you require that no one ever talk about history or context so that you can pass pure moral judgments, people are going to disagree with you. Your solution to that disagreement has been to other the people who disagree with you by giving them a derogatory name, dehumanizing them by reducing their intellectual agency, and then dismissing the entire category of people as irrelevant.

    Obama is an open murderer. Truman was an open murderer. Reagan was an open murderer. Both Clintons are open murderers. Thomas Jefferson was an open murderer, rapist, and slaver. Trump is an open murder, rapist, and slaver.

    We’re not talking about whataboutism. We’re talking about a conflict between open murderers where claiming one of them is a murderer doesn’t actually provide any moral clarity whatsoever. If everyone’s an open murderer, and you oppose Russia because Putin is an open murderer, than you must also oppose the US and NATO because they are run by open murderers. That’s the only consistent position.