• ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    70 ish people were struck

    No, the funniest thing is that was exactly 72 people which is the best meme Bolsonaro’s gang gave us: “Só mais 72hrs…”(Only 72 more hours…).

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    our politics in the last decade are full of this shit, more than usual. there are some delicious moments only brazil can provide you.

    for the next shenanigans, tune in to the next episode where bolsonaro and his gang try to break out of prison.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      It is a wonder how that man even continues to live. The next pandemic will be unleashed by his corpse I stg. Bro is festering in there

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 天前

        really on his way out. i bet they have to come in every week and clean the maggots out.

  • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 天前

    tangent asside, fuck using too much subtext, say what you mean. reading authors who intentionally don’t use subtext is such a breath of fresh air.

    • lorty@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 天前

      People say a lot more than what their words mean all the time. Having that in art is just part of being made by people.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        there’s still art in the mundane and the vulgar, closing yourself to that is like a food snob refusing to try stuff like burgers or soulfood.

    • BedbugCutlefish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 天前

      You aren’t wrong for liking what you like. But I love subtext, make me riddle out the meaning.

      I know this isn’t all ‘non-subtext’ works, but I hate when theres a beautiful passage that neatly implies what a character is thinking and feeling indirectly… Followed by them just blithely stating their current emotional state out loud. Hits like a sack of bricks every time.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        i don’t hate subtext, but reading some authors who most people consider garbage (very likely on the spectrum), it made me realize that there should be no rules. who decided that subtext was superior than direct text. or poetry better than vulgarity? those are arbitrary rules and stuff that breaks all convections can be amazing.

        and I will genuinely hold that Chuck tingle is worth a read. he breaks every single convection, and still makes books are that so loving and wholesome I actually had to hug his trans Harry Potter finalist erotica.

        not saying one is bad or better. just that those rules are made up and it’s ok to break them.