A number of pro-gun rights Republicans pushed back on the administration’s argument that Alex Pretti was dangerous because he had a gun. Pretti was legally licensed to carry one.

A war of words over deeply held beliefs erupted on the political right in the hours after a federal agent shot and killed Alex Pretti on a Minneapolis street Saturday, pitting top officials in Donald Trump’s administration against Second Amendment defenders in his electoral base.

At the core of the debate is that Pretti — who was permitted to carry a gun in public in Minnesota — had a concealed firearm on his person that eyewitness videos show federal agents apparently discovering and removing during the altercation that led to his death. Videos do not appear to show Pretti holding the weapon during that confrontation.

Kristi Noem sought to justify the killing by asserting at a news conference that Pretti “attacked those officers, had a weapon on him, and multiple dozens of rounds of ammunition, wishing to inflict harm on these officers coming, brandishing like that and impeding their work that they were doing.” No evidence has been provided to back up this account.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    23 hours ago

    The hunters you know exclusively hunt to survive? And don’t get started with the ethics of meat consumption bullshit. No creature deserves death because you like the taste of their flesh. End of discussion.

    Can a football kill someone?

    • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not exclusively to survive, but to allow their family to have a cheap protein source, and they probably would financially struggle even more if they couldn’t hunt.

      Animals die all the time to provide food for other creatures, and I would rather the animal have a good life out in the wilderness doing whatever it wants and then being quickly and painlessly killed than grown on a farm with little freedom for a couple years and then butchered. Also, then you can pay the proper respects to the animal for it’s flesh and you have to be the one to kill it not abstracting that away by buying it in a store. I understand not thinking any creature deserves to die but there are levels of nuance and levels of how ethical meat is to consume beyond that.

      Also, yeah a football probably could kill someone if you kicked it at their head hard enough and they didn’t have a helmet. A baseball definitely could if thrown by a professional pitcher. Not sure what relevance that has