Donald Trump’s threat to take control of Greenland “one way or the other” has left the territory and its sovereign power Denmark reeling and the rest of Europe scrambling for ways to stop him.

After the shock of the US’s military raid on Venezuela Trump’s ambition to put Greenland next on his hitlist is no longer being seen in Europe as bluster or fantasy, but a serious intention, driven by ideology, neo-imperial expansionism, US thirst for critical minerals, or all of the above.

Trump’s self-confessed disregard for international law is again exposing the painful dilemma caused by Europe’s crippling dependence on the US for military security: do they confront him or appease him, even as his rogue-state actions mirror the Russian invasion of Ukraine they say is illegal?

MBFC
Archive

  • matthewm05@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Further than they’ll go to protect Ukraine from Russia.

    The world is run by and for idiots.

  • comrade_twisty@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    Could the Media start doing its job and write how insane this behavior by the US actually is?

    This is not normal and the Media is complicit by just treating this as another random news story. It is not. It is utter insanity, total destruction of the western security apparatus and the foundation of geopolitical stability.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Some European sources are stating the obvious and using honest language. For many Western nations they still seem to be playing with words 'cause they’re scared of the repercussions.

    • I_Jedi@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well. Massive radioactivity, blindness, and a forever dusty sky will make people very sick. This means American health execs can make a lot of money if America launches a surprise invasion of NATO.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If they were serious at all about the threat, they would expel all the US forces currently in Greenland.

  • vane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Those idiots haven’t been able to survive in all year summer mountains (Afganistan Vietnam ) So they will obviously succeed in all year winter mountains ( Greenland ). The question should be how long until US Army fails to winter and run away.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Maybe I’m continuing to be naively optimistic, but it’s hard to see military brass agreeing to attack nato troops

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    With Ursula Von Der Leyen at the helm? fuck all, Europe first needs a leader that has Europe’s best interests in mind, Ursula is only interested in profit and misery.

  • etuomaala@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I would say this is not strictly news. It reads more like opinion, and is part of this new “This is Europe” newsletter. I don’t know why the Guardian put this article in their news section.

    • breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I think it’s more like news analysis than straight news or opinion. The line for me is that it’s bringing together recent reporting to get a sense of what Europe will or could do rather than making an argument for what Europe should do.