• VitoRobles@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    An asshole to whom exactly? A landlord?

    Also this is a shower thought. What’s with this moral crusade?

    • luciferofastora@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      To the people their arbitrage would harm because it would result in the landlord ending the free water provision. If you abuse a good thing, even the most good-natured people eventually get fed up and stop providing it, to the detriment of those who used it fairly.

    • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Think of it this way; 70% of the planet is water. Of that water only 2.5% is fresh water, 68% of that is held in glaciers. About 1% of the fresh water on earth is liquid.

      That 1% is the absolute maximum quantity of what’s used for drinking, and the steps between ground/reservoir water and the tap in your home involve MASSIVE quantities of electricity and effort to make it so it won’t kill you.

      What you’re suggesting doing is turning the tap on and sending that fresh drinkable water right back into the sewer to generate a miniscule amount of power, since the average tap pressure at 1 bar means you’ll be making sub 100W of power, hardly enough to power the big light in your kitchen if it’s got more than two incandescent bulbs or spotlights, let alone a kettle or a microwave.

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Depends. If you’re in a metropolitan city modern condo, there’s a good chance water is provided for all by the condo corp. The condo corp pays the city and adjusts the yearly budgets accordingly, which are then used to determine condo fees. So indirectly every resident pays for the water.