• UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s a pretty difficult claim to support because it requires you to make some pretty insane assumptions about what would have happened without NATO.

        • None of them. I think they are all equally capable of committing the crimes, but a gang is more dangerous than individual criminals acting on their own. So the gang [NATO] disbanding is a net positive.

    • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not difficult (except for Europeans and their settler counterpart) to understand that the world would be better off without NATO, your whiteness. “If it weren’t for NATO then it would’ve been anyone else!” isn’t the convincing claim you think it is. The burden of supporting such chickenshit non-claim is on you.

        • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, what’s your point? A terrorist organization ceasing to exist makes it slightly more difficult for European imperialist countries spearheaded by the largest imperialist, European settler-colony to collaborate and carry out their imperialist endeavors.