Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing cannot accept any country acting as the “world’s judge” after the United States captured Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro.

The world’s second-largest economy has provided Venezuela with an economic lifeline since the U.S. and its allies ramped up sanctions in 2017, purchasing roughly $1.6 billion worth of goods in 2024, the most recent full-year data available.

Almost half of China’s purchases were crude oil, customs data shows, while its state-owned oil giants had invested around $4.6 billion in Venezuela by 2018, according to data from the American Enterprise Institute think tank, which tracks Chinese overseas corporate investment.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    China is occupying Tibet and Hong Kong and claiming it owns Taiwan as well. It also frequently sends warships through seas owned by the Philippines where it has been illegally fishing and destroying Philippines fishing vessels. A couple of weeks ago Chinese authorities refused an Indian passport because they claimed that part of India belonged to China.

    Also, China waged war on it’s own people in Tienanmen Square.

    • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hong Kong was returned to china by the UK as agreed when it was leased. None (few?) of the people living there at the time of handowver were alive when the agreement was made but they were living in Hong Kong on borrowed tine regardless, legally speaking. It’s a very different situation to an illegal invasion.

      China not getting Hong Kong back as a territory would have been more damaging to international law and order and international treaties and agreements. International treaties and agreements are supposed to outlive those who agreed them. It’s between nations, not people.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, much as I dislike how it turned out and how China has been ignoring what post-unification rules there were on Hong Kong, the return itself was above board. Had I been living in Hong Kong in the years leading up I’d have taken the opportunity to get out if at all possible.

          • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Successor_state

            Example:

            USSR --> Succeeded by Russian Federation and they inherited the UN seat and the Non Proliferation Treaty

            ROC --> UN members voted to recognize PRC as the representative of “China”

            Returning Hong Kong to China wasn’t the issue, the issue is that PRC does not have democracy. If they had democracy, I doubt anyone would care that Hong Kong became part of China.

            I don’t think Hong Kongers want to secede, per se, they just want freedom.

            • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              If they had democracy, I doubt anyone would care that Hong Kong became part of China.

              I certainly wouldn’t. If anything I’d probably celebrate it.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s a not uncommon pattern to have “successor states” that inherit the treaties and obligations of the previous ones. For example how Russia “inherited” the Soviet Union’s position on the UN Security Council, or how Canada is bound by treaties with the First Nations that were signed by Britain (who we were a colony of at the time).

            Would have been a Big Funny if Britain had handed Hong Kong off to Taiwan instead, though.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        According to the BBC:

        What was agreed for the future of Hong Kong?

        China agreed to govern Hong Kong under the principle of “one country, two systems”, where the city would enjoy “a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs” for the next 50 years.

        Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region, and would retain certain freedoms, including:

        • an independent judiciary
        • multiple political parties
        • freedom of assembly and speech

        The territory has its own mini-constitution - the Basic Law - that enshrines these rights.

        It states that “the ultimate aim” is to elect the territory’s leader, the chief executive, “by universal suffrage” and “in accordance with democratic procedures”.

        What actually happened is the Chinese Government immediately went in with their military, restructured the legislative body, and cracked down hard on any dissent.

        YhSnGH0y2htDaGv.jpg

        ndlYaC0peLOPHu0.jpg

        mE3tMRa2BU251z8.jpg

        sUX5yEbGHwmRjKm.jpg

        KU2aGlbFVfuieOE.jpg

        4jNLHhTWSb6JkC9.jpg