The plane carrying Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Florida for talks with U.S. President Donald Trump passed through the airspace of three countries that are parties to the International Criminal Court, despite an active ICC arrest warrant against the Israeli leader.

Flight tracking data from FlightRadar24 showed Netanyahu’s aircraft, known as “Wings of Zion,” crossed the airspace of Greece, Italy and France before reaching the Atlantic Ocean.

All three countries are signatories to the Rome Statute, which obliges member states to cooperate with ICC arrest warrants.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes you can tell them you will arrest them if they fly over. And you should start a war.

    Not sure what the point of joining the ICU if you don’t want to hold the laws.

    • gustofwind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Start a war? Part of the point of joining international organizations is to stop war from reoccurring so for you to casually suggest starting a war is to come from a completely unserious position.

      • BoJackHorseman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You’re part of an international organisation. The other country is not part of that organisation. The countries in your international organisation would come to defend you.

        Also France is no “small country”

      • Insekticus@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Until the leaders of countries, and all those seeking that same power fear to misuse that power, war will be a natural state of our species.

        Sure, you might have to start a small war or two, but eventually people will get the point that their leaders need to be held accountable by the people of those countries, or other countries will hold them to account.

        Without any of that, we end up exactly right where we are, where leaders and countries can get away with genocide, completely invalidating any power those global institutions are supposed to wield.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      The war would be started by whoever illegally retaliated for a lawful arrest, not by whoever did the arresting.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        21 hours ago

        You intercept with fighter jets and give them one last chance to land. That’s not my opinion, that’s literally how it works.

        • bluemite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          And if they don’t…? It’s a nice idea, but do you think they’re going to shoot down a plane with other people on it and everything will just be fine?

            • bluemite@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              My point was I don’t think there would be any real consequences if they didn’t land and obviously shooting them down would cause a lot more problems. For the record, I dont think either are ok, I just think that’s the reality of the situation.