Children as young as 11 who demonstrate misogynistic behaviour will be taught the difference between pornography and real relationships, as part of a multimillion-pound investment to tackle misogyny in England’s schools, the Guardian understands.

On the eve of the government publishing its long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, David Lammy told the Guardian that the battle “begins with how we raise our boys”, adding that toxic masculinity and keeping girls and women safe were “bound together”.

As part of the government’s flagship strategy, which was initially expected in the spring, teachers will be able to send young people at risk of causing harm on behavioural courses, and will be trained to intervene if they witness disturbing or worrying behaviour.

  • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I doubt that the cause of misogyny in 11 year old boys is porn. I’m happy they’re trying something, I just hope it doesn’t backfire

    • ByteOnBikes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Same! I don’t know if this is the answer. But at least it’s something.

      Back in my day, we had Big Brother Big Sister programs. But those programs were overwhelmed by need even when I was young.

      And as kids (boys AND girls) turn to the internet and AI for direction about the opposite sex and how to treat each other, we need something to provide a another resource.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      yes, but if you were a unreasonable sex-negative person you would. and most people are unreasonable and have sex-negative views.

      it’s also loaded with sexist assumptions that boys are sex offenders by default unless they are ‘corrected’ by society.