Children as young as 11 who demonstrate misogynistic behaviour will be taught the difference between pornography and real relationships, as part of a multimillion-pound investment to tackle misogyny in England’s schools, the Guardian understands.
On the eve of the government publishing its long-awaited strategy to halve violence against women and girls (VAWG) in a decade, David Lammy told the Guardian that the battle “begins with how we raise our boys”, adding that toxic masculinity and keeping girls and women safe were “bound together”.
As part of the government’s flagship strategy, which was initially expected in the spring, teachers will be able to send young people at risk of causing harm on behavioural courses, and will be trained to intervene if they witness disturbing or worrying behaviour.
Well first, it wasn’t me who mentioned about musicians or adults in school girl clothing.
I have comment because, if a random selection of schoolchildren were photographed, I would expect an even distribion of boys and girls; and for girls short skirts, long skirts and trousers. But we we don’t see that in the pictures which are selected. We overwhelmingly see girls, in short skirts. In my opinion that is weird. It gives creepy uncle vibes.
Why would you expect to see many if any girls in long skirts or trousers. Are those particularly fashionable for girls in school?
Thinking back to my own school days, nearly every girl was wearing a skirt and they wanted it as short as the rules would let.
Not that I pay particular attention, but I have a high-school age daughter and from I’ve noticed, there seems to be an even split.
I think it’s weird to you, because you’re thinking unclean things. Children shouldn’t look like anything to you depending on their clothes. I’ll reiterate that you should address that within yourself; as there is nothing wrong with the picture or using pictures of boys and girls wearing their school uniforms.
Now you are moving the goal posts. “pictures of boys and girls wearing their school uniforms.” I’ve been quite clear that that’s not what I’m referring to. Can you explain why there is not an even distrubtion of boys/girls; long/short/trousers, as I described in my previous post?
No, I’m not explaining anything further to you. I’ve done enough free emotional labor for you and it’s now time for you to use your head.
😂. So you’ve finally understood my point. You could just say ‘oh, yeah, that is weird!’ but you got too invested in implying I’m a peado didn’t you? So now your pride won’t allow you to do anything but slink away. Bye!
Maybe you feel like girls and women owe you the labor that you are either too uneducated or lazy to obtain for yourself but even with owing you nothing, I gave you so much information you just don’t comprehend. I’m not a fan of wasting my time is all, so save the projection for the therapist you so desperately need.
The only information you have given me is that 1) you think I’m a peado and 2) you like looking at pictures of schoolgirls.
The one thing I have actually asked you: why do the newspapers so so many images of one particular type? And you refuse to answer. Whilst defending the practice.
If you require more female attention I suggest you speak with your mother. I don’t owe you anything, and you keep pressing me for replies like you are owed something from me or anyone else. Goodbye.
I’m pressing you for one reply, to justify or defend the position you have argued yourself into. But you can’t, can you because you know you’re wrong. Or you like looking at pictures of schoolgirls…