• Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    There’s a two day trek and a four day trek. We did the two day which means you walk for one day (6 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.) and then tour the place the next day. The hiking day was quite a bit of climbing, about 600 meter altitude change, but the path was decent and there weren’t any scamble up climbs. You visit the village where the engineers who built Machu Picchu lived, a cool site in itself. In mid afternoon, you come over the rise and look down on Machu Picchu. It was superb. Overnight, they (the tours) take you down to a hotel in Aguas Calientes. I don’t think I’d do the four day. The last two days are identical to the two-day trek but you stay in tents every night and the bathroom facilities are sketchy. There’s also the option of taking the train in and seeing Machu Picchu without the trek.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Had no idea it was still so relatively hard to access. I think that’s a good thing. Definitely somewhere I would love to visit one day.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s really not…You could hike the whole inca trail and spend 3 weeks getting there, or you could take a bus and hike a couple minutes

      • Quilotoa@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yes, on the tour, everything is provided except for lunch on the second day. The food during the hike was excellent. The restaurant food in Aguas Calientes was mediocre.