Zohran Mamdani’s campaign represented a struggle for basic dignity and an affirmation of democratic potential. It was ceaselessly denounced by political and media elites from across the spectrum as something sinister, violent, and dangerous.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Democrats in office, state and federal, overwhelmingly support Mamdani, even Jeffries, and the exceptions make the rule.

    • piefood@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      They begrudgingly supported him once it became clear that he was going to win. They never wanted to support him, they are only doing it to save face. How long did it take Jeffries to endorse him?

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Fuck if I know, or care, feel free to go count the days.

        We here on the left don’t worship our politicians so it may surprise you to learn we’re not heartbroken about Jeffries or Schumer saying some shit we didn’t like.

        • piefood@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yes, I know that you don’t care about data that does’t fit your obviously bullshit narrative. That’s like… your whole thing.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            “Data that does’t fit your obviously bullshit narrative” being the number of days it took a single DNC politician to endorse Zohran Mamdani? Man, what a hill to die on.

            • piefood@feddit.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Who is dying on a hill? I’m just pointing out that I know you don’t care about data when you find it inconvenient. Data like:

              “They begrudgingly supported him once it became clear that he was going to win. They never wanted to support him, they are only doing it to save face.”

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                “They” this “they” that, is this also the faceless them who own the banks lol? The vast majority, everyone minus a rounding error, endorsed Mamdani and were excited by his victory in the DNC. We’re lucky to have him, like a second Bernie Sanders but not even Bernie runs on the DNC ticket outside of presidential primaries we invite him to participate in.

                • piefood@feddit.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Who is talking about the banks? WTF are you on about?

                  The vast majority, everyone minus a rounding error, endorsed Mamdani and were excited by his victory in the DNC.

                  I think you missed this part again:

                  “They begrudgingly supported him once it became clear that he was going to win. They never wanted to support him, they are only doing it to save face.”

                  It’s almost like you don’t like engaging with data that doesn’t fit your narrative. Weird, I wonder where I heard that before.