“What the public doesn’t know is that the fundamental assumption of radiation safety and regulation simply isn’t true. This is the case against Linear No-Threshold.”
I found this video getting more interesting the further it went on. No relationship between cancer and radiation? And cancer rates go down for those with radiation exposure? You may be radiation deficient?
Whoa!
Thank you for sharing, I’m living at 11,200 ft right now, very likely receiving higher doses of radiation coincidentally, and this video and especially it’s included data that I had no knowledge of whatsoever previously, has literally changed how I see every part of the world that has to do with radiation.
Fascinating, reassuring, fascinating.
I asked everyone I knew in the medical field about Fukushima after it happened, literal doctors, about why there were no radioactive casualties and I got so many answers that didn’t fit.
And here’s the answer, LNT.
Crazy.
He tries to argue that evolution would disprove radiation damage, but what is beneficial to the population can be detrimental to the individual. If you have procreated before developing cancer, you have passed on your genes, that’s an evolutionary success.
Other than that, the data showed is intriguing.
I wish the people downvoting would explain why, though.
