Congressional Democrats are marching in lockstep into the fourth week of a government shutdown, even as lawmakers brace for what could be the most painful point yet — a cutoff in federal food aid for more than 40 million people.

But Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries are signaling that there will be no change in strategy: Democrats won’t provide the votes to reopen the government unless their demands over health care are met. And they’re increasingly hammering President Donald Trump for his failure to sit down to negotiate with Democrats, while instead embarking on his second foreign trip so far during the shutdown.

“This is all Trump,” a visibly frustrated Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont told CNN. “Trump’s not engaged. Republicans won’t negotiate,” Welch said, arguing that Trump’s trip to Asia this week as “an indication of how he could care less.”

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Oh ok.

    So you’re not planning ahead.

    Luckily we can see from Minnesota that planning more than a week ahead of time pays off. And that’s the direction the DNC is moving: planning ahead and distributing power in case we lose the DNC to neoliberals again.

    It would be great if you “pressured” organizations that can do something and should do something instead of random organizations that are actually fixing themselves…

    But considering your “pressure” is reposting social media comments to Lemmy, well, it doesn’t really matter if what you’re doing is right or not.

    Feel free to “go after” Taco Bell for discontinuing the McDonald’s dollar menu if you want as well, people probably won’t get as upset even tho it’s just as illogical. But politics is an important topic these days

    • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Did it ever occur to you that you don’t know anything about the person you are talking down to and that it might be more effective to engage in a minimal level of politeness?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, bro…

        Obviously we should just do easy things that don’t matter instead of productive things that are difficult.

        Who cares if it’s effective as long as you get a quick dopamine hit.

        Feel free to go boycott Target about Exon mobile.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I think you completely missed my point.

          You are being aggressive and short tempered with someone who is your ally.

          There is no justifiable reason to treat people this way.

          All the snark does not help. That’s not how to have a productive conversation. You know that messaging matters and so all this could possibly mean is that you care more about feeling good from being snarky than actually improving anything.

        • mad_lentil@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No one is disagreeing with you. The antagonist you imagine is not in this comment thread