cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/4856698
A senior official from a Moscow based global satellite organisation has flown to Australia to discuss the “threat and use of force” in space, angering the local Ukrainian community which is demanding to know why she was granted a visa.
Elina Morozova, executive director of Intersputnik, is among several Russian Federation representatives to attend this week’s International Astronautical Congress being held in Sydney.
…
In 2021 Australia joined other nations in condemning Russia for conducting a “provocative and dangerous” anti-satellite weapon test that produced over 1500 pieces of debris that threatened other satellites and the International Space Station.
Numerous recent reports including a study published by the RAND Corporation in the United States in May have highlighted how “space-based services and the disruption of these services have played an unprecedented role in the ongoing war in Ukraine”.
The Nightly understands several other Russian delegates who had been scheduled to participate at this week’s astronautical congress were denied entry into Australia because of possible links to military programs as the war in Ukraine continues.
…
“Frankly, as a community, we are appalled that delegates from Russian science and research institutions have been allowed to enter Australia,” says Kateryna Argyrou, the Chair of the Australian Federation of Ukrainian Organisations.
“These are not neutral academics — their research underpins Russia’s weapons systems, which are killing Ukrainians every day.”
“It is a double standard for the Government to claim it ‘stands with Ukraine’ while offering a platform for information exchange and legitimacy to enablers of Russian war crimes,” Ms Argyrou told The Nightly.
“We must not forget that every representative of the Russian Federation is a representative of a genocidal regime.”
Right to move? How is that arranged or made legal?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement
The whole system of travel between countries being a privilege rather than a right is insanely authoritarian and is the basis of a lot of oppression worldwide (see: the whole concept of an illegal immigrant). Now that doesn’t mean exceptions can’t exist (like the person in the OP), but they should be that: exceptions.
It’s a human right. To be a democracy you need to already have all human rights codified in your legislation.
People have the right to leave the country they are in, or return to the country they’re a citizen of. No other country has to let you in.
According to UN yes, but that’s a pretty low standard. I’m talking about real democratic values.
Also how are you going to leave your country if every other country is blocking you off?
You don’t get to make up definitions to suit your needs.
Did I just invented the concept of open borders? Where is my Nobel price? So many international organizations asking for it and I’m the first one to articulate the definition.
This is absolutely not true. And furthermore countries are not required to allow anyone to enter. Nice ideal maybe but not reality, nor practical.
This whole thing loops back to Russia hmmmm
Required by whom? I don’t care about practicality. Slavery is much more practical than having everyone be free, so I guess that’s okay too.