• redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You’re not a reader. That’s the name of a free book. How would you be a regular reader of a singular book?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      So its not even a scientific journal under which claims undergo scrutiny and review?

      Even less worth offering one iota more of attention.

      • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        You reread what you just typed and think about it. Scientific Journal. Wow.

        40th phrack just came out. Seems relevant…

          • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Because your pathological need to seek validation and prove yourself right has you coming back wasting time talking to me, a person who thinks you’re an arrogant armchair intellectual. And that’s as much a waste of time as all the rest of your impotent bitchy posts.

            Why not read instead?

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Because your pathological need to seek validation and prove yourself right has you coming back wasting time

              They said as they returned back to the thread seeking validation and to prove themselves right.

              The reason I won’t engage with conspiratorial thinking is because I know better than to give bad faith arguers charity or space. If you don’t have the ability to establish standards of quality for the material you promote, do us all a favor and don’t promote any ideas or content, because the only thing impotent here is you while you try and have 8 arguments across different threads of people rejecting this.

              arrogant armchair intellectual.

              Sure but at least I own it. And I get it right, which is far better than whatever you are doing.

              • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I’m aware this is a waste of time and find you funny. Angsty grad student vibes mixed with an undeserved sense of superiority.

                You know what the Dunning Krueger curve is I’m sure. I bet you think you plot on the right side for a dozen subjects you never studied.

                • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  It really doesn’t matter. You are promoting unfounded conspiratorial thinking and that needs to be pushed back on. Its a cultural disease to do so, and its even worse to promote it. Develop some rigor to your thinking instead of the slop you’ve asked people to “do their own research on” here.