I’m mostly sailing the high seas, using the tv as a giant monitor for the always-on laptop connected to it. I’m afraid of the 1984-esque “You must connect to the internet to continue using this TV” that might come after some time.

    • Q@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Qb series Samsung are commercial displays but no Netflix or smart features. However, they are about double the price of a standard tv. Will last forever though. I would rather buy a less expensive and not connect it to the network.

      • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Fuckin a, you weren’t kidding.

        This is from Amazon on the first two I saw in USD

        I spent less than $500 for my 50” 4K Samsung but here is twice the price.

    • habitualTartare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They don’t really as the “smart” subsidies the cost of the TV. Some commerical grade TVs and large monitors won’t be smart or need Internet connectivity.

    • remon@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I got a “signage display”, which is basically just a large monitor connected via HDMI.

      • Im_old@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The problem with those is that the picture quality is not the same as traditional TVs.

        • remon@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I guess. But it’s good enough for me and all my content is only in 1080p anyway, so I don’t think the display is limiting me too much.

    • codenamekino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Spectre makes a line of dumb TVs, but I don’t think any of them are 4k. I spent about $600 on a 75" 1080p model last year.

    • shininghero@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Given that you’re using this for a laptop, you’re looking for a monitor. Not a TV.

      Anything suitable for office work should be good here.

      • MudMan@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I mean… it depends on the type of TV you’re trying to replace. If you’re on a 65 inch OLED you’re not going to replace that with an office monitor.

        There are really good “dumb” PC monitors for media watching in the 24-42 inch range, though. They’re just… often not cheap.

        • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 hours ago

          But even monitors are infected with ‘SmArT teeVEe’ bloat. My pc monitor is basically a TV, and is much worse because of it.

          • MudMan@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Is it? The monitors I’m currently using are fairly new and don’t seem to have any connected tools. There isn’t even an app to set them up (which I may actually find practical), it’s all OSD stuff.

            I think even if there are connected monitors out there, it’s certainly easier to find “dumb” monitors, even with high end specs, than dumb TVs. The real hard breaks are size and feature set, in my experience.