• bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yeah, but first you were talking about how the general populace was going right. Corbyn clearly disproves that. This idea that success (which maybe doesn’t require to form the next government) translates to a higher share in votes might be a statistical thing, but it’s not constructive, it just leads to opportunism.

    Since the majority of voters are workers it shouldn’t be that hard for the left to offer them something, right?

    I don’t think your last paragraph makes much sense.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, but first you were talking about how the general populace was going right

      They subsequently elected Starmer, of all people, didn’t they?

      This idea that success (which maybe doesn’t require to form the next government) translates to a higher share in votes might be a statistical thing, but it’s not constructive, it just leads to opportunism.

      I’m sorry, if Corbyn didn’t form a government, as majority or coalition partner, didn’t move politics in the UK left, nor politics in his own party left, nor moved demographics in the UK left… what kind of success are we looking at, here?

      For the record, I’m not blaming Corbyn for this loss. Far from it. I’m only saying that going left is not enough