See original problem here

So I played with all kinds of settings in PrusaSlicer. Nothing changed anything.

The only things that did improve the outcome some was:

  • Forcing the letters to be printed first: then the letters are smooshed and bleed into the background instead of the other way round, which arguably looks better / more legible. Nothing to write home about though.

  • Dropping the first layer’s height to 0.1mm (the other layers are 0.2mm high): that improves the letters a bit.

  • Dropping the first layer’s height to 0.05mm: because the first layer is so thin, it becomes kind of translucent and the wider white letter beneath it sort of show through. The net result is that it drops a kind of gaussian blur onto the lettering, which actually improves them - especially at a distance.

Other than that, there’s just nothing for it. And half of the suggestions I got concern other slicers, and I couldn’t find them or equivalents in PrusaSlicer. Oh well…

I guess that’s as good as it’s gonna get.

  • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    This is a resolution issue, so think about X & Y settings rather than Z settings like layer height. You need to reduce the line width and/or use a smaller nozzle like 0.2mm. You might also have a bit too much squish on your first layer which you could measure by printing a line and measuring it with calipers and comparing the slicer value to the actual value to see if there’s any difference.

    I’m not familiar with PrusaSlicer but Bambu Studio has a wall generating setting called “Arachne” which does a better job of generating the small features/walls you need for text even with a 0.4mm nozzle. You might see if there’s a comparable setting for Prusa.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You’re correct. A 0.2mm nozzle would certainly improve things. But it would also make printing those tabs unbearably long.

      I wish my company had bought a 5-head Prusa XL: then I could have loaded black PLA and white PLA in two heads with 0.2mm nozzles, and a separate feed of black PLA in a third head with a 0.4mm nozzle for the rest of the parts that don’t need to look nice. But… ours only has two heads and it’s 0.4mm on both, because all the other parts we prints just don’t need finer details.

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Try reducing the line width especially for the initial layer. I googled about Arachne line generator and it looks like it’s the default wall generator in PrusaSlicer as of v2.5. I can’t tell if you’re using a textured build plate or not but you could also try swapping to a smooth one (or vice versa) and seeing if that makes any difference. You don’t even need to print the whole tab for testing, just the first few layers to see if you’re on the right track.

        You could also try using a 0.2mm nozzle just for the white filament and seeing if that helps.

  • greybeard@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Just a thought: Try making the first layer of letters empty so the letter fill is actually a layer 2 bridge.

    A trick I have done is printing the first layer solid in a transparent filament, then layer 2 as 2 color.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    From the other post I remember you said that having the letters in the top layers didn’t work for you, because that meant a lot of support material to remove.

    From what I understand, your product consists of two parts. The large part with the letters and a counter part, which is just a flat piece.

    So why not put the letters in the flat piece? That way you can print them either way up.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So why not put the letters in the flat piece? That way you can print them either way up.

      Good thinking!

      In fact, that’s what I did first: the markings were on the lids rather than on the shells.

      The problem is, because the lids are dovetailed, they’re narrower than the shells they dovetail into, so the width for the markings is reduced. meaning the letters need to be smaller, meaning they look even worse on the lids.

      • LycanGalen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I would rotate the text 90 degrees so that it has the full length of the top tab, that should give you more room to work, and most humans can read rotated text.

        Another suggestion would be to try a different font that works with the printing limitations: something curved like Exo 2 might be a little less of a fight.

  • ladicius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Besides printing issues: If I were a user of these adapters I’d be fine with what you got - it’s readable, and I wouldn’t expect high definition on this.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Thanks!

      Yes, they’re perfectly serviceable. I’d just like them to look more “professional” I guess, for my personal pride 🙂

    • StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Fuck me retraction has done me dirty so many times, I’m convinced it’s just not worth it unless you’ve got a direct drive extruder

      • ffhein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You mean you have turned it off completely? I used it with the stock E3v2 extruder and BMG in Bowden mode, and later with BMG in direct drive mode, without any retraction related problems and I think it’s the same for the majority of 3d printer owners. Perhaps your printer had some other issue, which only showed up in combination with retraction?

  • mvirts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I was thinking you could inset the letter boundaries on the letters first setup, but it looks like you only get 2 walls out of the slicer. Maybe try setting it to not outline the walls at all in letter first mode?

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m not sure if any of the tips will translate well to your project, but this is another project that worked with small lettering: https://youtu.be/e7K3BXWmipk

    That being said, I printed this project, and the results were kinda ‘meh’ even after loads of manual cleanup. Probably one of the most tedious prints I’ve ever had to do.

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So the guy printed throwaway first layer that he filed off to uncover nice- (or at least nicer-)printed letters underneath? Interesting concept. Too much time to spend on my little tabs though, since I make them by the bedloads for our many cables, but I like the idea.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, just building a single unit of these was mind numbing. If I had the money, I would’ve just bought premade buttons. I’ll never make one again.